Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 748517
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T14:19:46+00:00 2026-05-14T14:19:46+00:00

Building a site super quick and having it work on all my Mac browsers,

  • 0

Building a site super quick and having it work on all my Mac browsers, I thought I’d take a gander on a friends old dell laptop with Windows XP and IE6.

Nothing looks remotely correct. It’s because I used lots of left/right/top/bottom (constraint) declarations to size elements proportionally to their parent’s size (I didn’t use percent sizes because the percents refer to the parent’s size before margins and padding are applied, left/right/top/bottom refer to them after with position:absolute. I’m asking about that here :)).

I’ve read lots these past few weeks on how horrible IE6 (and IE) is in general, but because of all the reasons people say to support it (large market share and the fear of installing better software), and because half the people in the company we’re building a site for use IE6 (getting them to upgrade to Chrome slowly but surely), I thought if I could just get IE6 to render my constraints, that might help.

So I am messing around with simple layouts here, and they work fine in my latest versions of Firefox, Safari, Chrome, and Opera, but IE6 is basically saying:

If you haven’t set a width or height on me, I’m assuming it’s zero.

But position:absolute; left:0px; right:0px; top:0px; bottom:0px; on a container that’s width:1000px; height:1000px; should be the same as setting width:1000px; height:1000px on the child, no?

Taking a quick look at the source for this, why won’t IE6 render the constraint based absolutely positioned AND SIZED elements? (note: I will be messing around with that file for a while)

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T14:19:46+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:19 pm

    In short, yes, it really doesn’t allow this (“absolute edge-positioning”); it’s a well-known and long-standing bug. Missing width on absolute-positioned elements always triggers shrink-to-fit behaviour even if width should be deducible from left/right. Same vertically.

    why won’t IE6 render the constraint based absolutely positioned AND SIZED elements?

    I don’t see that in the example at the moment. In general if you declare both edges and a dimension (eg. left+right+width), an absolutely-positioned elements is ‘over-constrained’ and one of the rules is discarded to make the others fit.

    /* tables still need ‘cellspacing=”0″‘ in the markup */

    Nope. A combination of border-collapse: collapse; border-spacing: 0; plus padding: 0 on the cells renders cellspacing/cellpadding unnecessary (thank goodness).

    clear:both; /* ie6 requires for absolutely positioned elements! */

    ???

    no.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

building a site which has content for each section. urls range from; /work/ /work/print/
I'm building a site right now, so far I've painfully forced everything to be
I am building a site that uses a simple AJAX Servlet to talk JMS
I'm building a site that's sort of a cross between StackOverflow and Digg (only
I am building a site in asp.net and have multiple subdomains. For example, one.cookies.com
I am building a site and I have a list of status updates and
Ok. So I'm building this site which is accessible through two different domains. So
It should be an easy question , I am building a site under IIS
I'm building a PHP site, but for now the only PHP I'm using is
I'm building a new site for my company, and I'm at the stage where

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.