Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8500377
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T00:55:44+00:00 2026-06-11T00:55:44+00:00

By default a service and activity, share the same process, the application context is

  • 0

By default a service and activity, share the same process, the application context is a class that can share stuff between this 2 isolated classes, is that true? is it a good practice to use the application object as a shared global state holder?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T00:55:45+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 12:55 am

    Why not. You application object can outlive server or activity so it is technically perfectly fine to act as ‘hub’ connecting all application elements. Of course you should back it up with persistent storage in case you whole app gets killed, but in general: “yes”.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

So I've been using the Windows Workflow default SQL persistence service that handles everything
I am a begginer in android,here I have activity that use web service: SoapObject
I have an .apk that has a Service and an Activity that I want
I have an activity that offloads multiple uploads to a Intent Service. Each upload
I have this service: public class AAAService extends Service { private Intent requestService; private
Is there a default activity in Android that handles the opening of files? For
Activity Class: Develop a class that suggests an activity based upon the temperature. The
I have a service that fetches the value of a value from an activity
I created a WCF service and to the default service I added another operation
I have one test wcf service with default methods and web config is :

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.