Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1098779
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T00:37:53+00:00 2026-05-17T00:37:53+00:00

By default, ActiveRecord takes all fields from the corresponding database table and creates public

  • 0

By default, ActiveRecord takes all fields from the corresponding database table and creates public attributes for all of them.

I think that it’s reasonable not to make all attributes in a model public. Even more, exposing attributes that are meant for internal use clutters the model’s interface and violates the encapsulation principle.

So, is there a way to make some of the attributes literally private?

Or, maybe I should move on to some other ORM?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T00:37:54+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 12:37 am

    Jordini was most of the way there

    Most of active_record happens in method_missing. If you define the method up front, it won’t hit method_missing for that method, and use yours instead (effectively overwriting, but not really)

    class YourModel < ActiveRecord::Base
    
      private
    
      def my_private_attribute
        self[:my_private_attribute]
      end
    
      def my_private_attribute=(val)
        write_attribute :my_private_attribute, val
      end
    
    end
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 545k
  • Answers 545k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Ok you are trying to end a vector of strings,… May 17, 2026 at 8:51 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer yes, the type of *result is ('cause the type of… May 17, 2026 at 8:45 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I don't see any way to do so in the… May 17, 2026 at 8:45 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

i have table AuditLog with fields including: audited_id | audited_type That results in data
The default rails XML builder escapes all HTML, so something like: atom_feed do |feed|
how do I change my activerecord model default behavior for the find method? For
If I have an ActiveRecord::Base model with a default-scope: class Foo < ActiveRecord::Base default_scope
I have a relationship in my ActiveRecord based model that looks like: belongs_to :foo
default is 49 how to edit to higher?
The default shell in Mac OS X is bash , which I'm generally happy
By default each row of a Gridview maps to each row in a datatable
By default IntelliJ IDEA 7.0.4 seems to use 4 spaces for indentation in XML
By default the webjump hotlist has the following which I use quite often: M-x

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.