Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 49731
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:28:58+00:00 2026-05-10T16:28:58+00:00

By default, in C++, a single-argument constructor can be used as an implicit conversion

  • 0

By default, in C++, a single-argument constructor can be used as an implicit conversion operator. This can be suppressed by marking the constructor as explicit.

I’d prefer to make ‘explicit’ be the default, so that the compiler cannot silently use these constructors for conversion.

Is there a way to do this in standard C++? Failing that, is there a pragma (or similar) that’ll work in Microsoft C++ to do this? What about g++ (we don’t use it, but it might be useful information)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:28:58+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:28 pm

    Nope, you have to do it all by hand. It’s a pain, but you certainly should get in the habit of making single argument constructors explicit. I can’t imagine the pain you would have if you did find a solution and then had to port the code to another platform. You should usually shy away from compiler extensions like this because it will make the code less portable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 75k
  • Answers 75k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer As ever, Ryan Bates has a Railscast on this very… May 11, 2026 at 2:38 pm
  • added an answer Without using GO, programmatically, you would need to make 2… May 11, 2026 at 2:38 pm
  • added an answer What you want is this overload : //linkText, actionName, controllerName,… May 11, 2026 at 2:38 pm

Related Questions

Is there any real reason not to make a member function virtual in C++?
I have a class in C++ with the following member: map< someEnum, vector<SomeObject*>* >
Newbie question. Looking at arrays (ie: dynamically sized) this works: NSArray *array; array =
Is there a way to identify unused attributes/methods in Visual C++ 2008 Professional? If

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.