Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3346652
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T01:19:45+00:00 2026-05-18T01:19:45+00:00

C++03 $13.6/1- […]If there is a user-written candidate with the same name and parameter

  • 0

C++03 $13.6/1- “[…]If there is a
user-written candidate with the same
name and parameter types as a built-in
candidate operator function, the
built-in operator function is hidden
and is not included in the set of
candidate functions.”

I am not sure about the intent of this quote from the Standard. Is it possible to define a user defined candidate function that has the same name and type as a built-in operator?

e.g. the below which is clearly wrong.

int operator+(int)

So what does this quote mean?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T01:19:46+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 1:19 am

    Just pick one of those in 13.6. Like

    For every pointer or enumeration type T, there exist candidate operator functions of the form

    bool operator<(T, T);
    bool operator>(T, T);
    bool operator<=(T, T);
    bool operator>=(T, T);
    bool operator==(T, T);
    bool operator!=(T, T);
    

    So

    enum Kind { Evil, Good };
    bool operator<(Kind a, Kind b) { ... }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

CGI.escapeHTML is pretty bad, but CGI.unescapeHTML is completely borked. For example: require 'cgi' CGI.unescapeHTML('&#8230;')
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString
I have a MySQL query: SELECT px.player, px.pos, px.year, px.age, px.gp, px.goals, px.assists ,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.