Question

C++11 adds the ability for telling the compiler to create a default implementation of any of the special member functions. While I can see the value of deleting a function, where’s the value of explicitly defaulting a function? Just leave it blank and the compiler will do it anyway.

The only point I can see is that a default constructor is only created when no other constructor exists:

class eg {
public:
    eg(int i);
    eg() = default; 
};

But is that really better than how you do it now?

class eg {
public:
    eg(int i);
    eg() {}
};

Or am I missing a use-case?

Answer 1

A defaulted constructor will have a declaration, and that declaration will be subject to the normal access rules. E.g. you can make the default copy constructor protected. Without these new declarations, the default generated members are public.