Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7513407
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T00:10:35+00:00 2026-05-30T00:10:35+00:00

Calling all JS historians. A common pattern is to alias a class’ prototype to

  • 0

Calling all JS historians.

A common pattern is to alias a class’ prototype to fn, which is less verbose.

Where did the object.prototype===object.fn convention originate in JavaScript?

I see many libraries using it.

Just curious.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T00:10:37+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 12:10 am

    I believe this practice comes from original jQuery code where author wanted to shield developers from complexity (or natural beauty) of JavaScript native feature – prototypes.

    Another potential reason could be the need to remove possible connotation [with existing PrototypeJS library] of the internal jQuery library prototype aspect.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is a similar problem: Link Which was solved by calling GetAsyncKeyState(). While all
Calling all AutoMapper gurus! I'd like to be able to map object A to
Calling all MQ Gurus, I have a box under my desk which we use
Calling all C macro gurus... Is there any way to write a C macro
Given a BehaviorSubject, what is the practical difference between calling all of these different
I have a list of calling codes for all countries(the phone number prefixes), I
Will calling close on my WCF service kill all resources or set them up
Hi All I am currently having an issue calling a WCF service from a
I'm calling a web service from a console app - all in C# on
I am using a ThreadPool via ExecutorService. By calling shutDownNow() it interrupts all running

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.