Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 456051
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T22:25:58+00:00 2026-05-12T22:25:58+00:00

Calling fclose() here after dup() ing its file descriptor blocks until the child process

  • 0

Calling fclose() here after dup()ing its file descriptor blocks until the child process has ended (presumably because the stream has ended).

FILE *f = popen("./output", "r");
int d = dup(fileno(f));
fclose(f);

However by manually performing the pipe(), fork(), execvp() of the popen(), and then dup()ing the pipe’s read file descriptor, closing the original does not block.

int p[2];
pipe(p);
switch (fork()) {
    case 0: {
        char *argv[] = {"./output", NULL};
        close(p[0]);
        dup2(p[1], 1);
        execvp(*argv, argv);
    }
    default: {
        close(p[1]);
        int d = dup(p[0]);
        close(p[0]);
    }
}

Why does this occur, and how can I close the FILE * returned from popen() and use a file descriptor in its place?

Update:

I’m aware that the documentation says to use pclose(), however fclose() blocks as well. Furthermore, I poked around in the glibc code, and pclose() just calls fclose(). The behaviour is the same, whether fclose() or pclose() is used.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T22:25:58+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 10:25 pm

    Disappointed with the generality of the answers so far (I can RTFM, tyvm), I’ve investigated this thoroughly, by stepping through and reading the glibc source.

    In glibc pclose() directly calls fclose() with no additional effect, so the 2 calls are same. In fact you could use pclose() and fclose() interchangeably. I’m sure this is purely a coincidence in the evolved implementation, and the use of pclose() to close a FILE * returned from popen() is still recommended.

    The magic is in popen(). FILE *s in glibc contain a jump table with pointers to appropriate functions to handle such calls as fseek(), fread(), and of relevance fclose(). When calling popen(), a different jump table used than the one used by fopen(). The close member in this jump table points to a special function _IO_new_proc_close, which calls waitpid() on the pid stored in the region pointed to by FILE *.

    Here’s the relevant call stack in my version of glibc, which I’ve annotated with notes about what is going on:

    // linux waitpid system call interface
    #0  0x00f9a422 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
    #1  0x00c38513 in __waitpid_nocancel () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
    
    // removes fp from a chain of proc files
    // and waits for the process of the stored pid to terminate
    #2  0x00bff248 in _IO_new_proc_close (fp=0x804b008) at iopopen.c:357
    
    // flushes the stream and calls close in its jump table
    #3  0x00c09ff3 in _IO_new_file_close_it (fp=0x804b008) at fileops.c:175
    
    // destroys the FILEs buffers
    #4  0x00bfd548 in _IO_new_fclose (fp=0x804b008) at iofclose.c:62
    
    // calls fclose
    #5  0x00c017fd in __new_pclose (fp=0x804b008) at pclose.c:43
    
    // calls pclose
    #6  0x08048788 in main () at opener.c:34
    

    So the short of it is, using popen(), the returned FILE * must not be closed, even if you dup() its file descriptor, because it will block until the child process terminates. Of course, after this you’ll be left with a file descriptor to a pipe which will contain whatever the child process managed to write() to it before terminating.

    By not fread()ing with the file pointer returned from popen(), the underlying pipe will not be touched, it’s safe to use the file descriptor by fileno(), and finish up by calling pclose().

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Calling getActionBar returns null . This has been frequently reported so I've made sure
I was just wondering about the functions fopen, fclose, socket and closesocket. When calling
My web host has a process killer which terminates any process running longer than
Calling all Oracle Gurus! I am in the process of clustering a well tested
Calling TextView.setTextSize() is working abnormally. Right after the call to setTextSize if we get
Calling setBackgroundDrawable before showing the PopupWindow works fine. But when I call it after
Calling the WriteObject Method from a background thread is not possible! Is there a
Calling TextRenderer.MeasureText as follows: TextRenderer.MeasureText(myControl.Text, myControl.Font); and comparing the result to the size of
Calling image = Image.open(data) image.thumbnail((36,36), Image.NEAREST) will maintain the aspect ratio. But I need
Calling Html.RenderPartial(~/Views/Payments/MyControl.ascx); from a view works if MyControl.ascx is a control that directly inherits

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.