Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 147993
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T08:52:44+00:00 2026-05-11T08:52:44+00:00

Can anyone clearly articulate when you use a field and when to use a

  • 0

Can anyone clearly articulate when you use a field and when to use a property in class design?

Consider:

public string Name; 

Or:

private string _Name; public string Name {    get { return _Name; }    set { _Name = value; } } 

I realize that the second method is more proper and flexible, so that’s what I try to use, generally.

But then why do I see people use the first method? Are they just lazy, or is there some specific situation where it’s the correct choice? Is it just a matter of preference?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T08:52:45+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 8:52 am

    Well in C# 3.0 you can actually write:

    public string Name {get; set;} 

    Which allows you to be proper and lazy.

    Generally speaking, with properties, you get proper encapsulation. You have the choice to allow setting a value, or getting it, or both. Using a public member, you don’t have that option.

    It’s probably one-part preference, and one-part how your team decides to handle quick and dirty class definitions, but I would say, use properties for get/sets.

    To answer

    Can anyone clearly articulate when you use an attribute and when to use a property in class design?

    You shouldn’t ever use a public attribute. You should always use a property instead. It’s safer and more flexible. That said, people will be lazy, and just use a public member. However, with C# 3.0 you can use a more terse syntax to define properties, which should satisfy your inner laziness.

    Simply type prop and hit <tab> to expedite the laziness in adding a property.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 76k
  • Answers 77k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer One of the simplest ways to ensure you get all… May 11, 2026 at 3:16 pm
  • added an answer It turns out this can be done. <Rectangle x:Name='myRect' Width='28'… May 11, 2026 at 3:16 pm
  • added an answer First, run tlibimp.exe (found under Program Files\Borland\C++Builder\Bin) with the ocx\dll… May 11, 2026 at 3:16 pm

Related Questions

Can anyone explain the difference between the types mentioned above and some sample usage
I run in to something that illustrates how I clearly don't get it yet.
In Jesse Liberty's Learning C# book, he says "Objects of one type can be
I am using .NET remoting to retrieve periodic status updates from a Windows service

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.