Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6705055
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T07:21:35+00:00 2026-05-26T07:21:35+00:00

Can anyone explain why in linux when I start gcc or javac after some

  • 0

Can anyone explain why in linux when I start gcc or javac after some time of inactivity it takes a while for them to start. Subsequent invocations are way faster. Is there a way to ensure quick startup always? (This requirement may seem strange, but is necessary in my case). Ubuntu by the way.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T07:21:36+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 7:21 am

    Most likely, it’s the time it takes for code pages to fault in. There are a few ways to avoid this delay if you really have to. The simplest would be to run gcc periodically. Another would be to install gcc to a RAM disk.

    Another approach would be to make a list of which files are involved and then write a simple program to lock all those files into memory. You can use something like:
    strace -f gcc *rest of gcc command* 2>&1 | grep open | grep -v -- -1
    Use a GCC command line that’s typical of how you are using GCC.

    You’ll find libraries and binaries being opened in there. Make a full list in a file. Then write a program that calls mlockall(MCL_FUTURE) then reads in filenames from the file. For each file, mmap it into memory and read each byte. Then have the program just sleep forever (or until killed).

    This will have the effect of forcing every page of every file in memory. You should check the total size of all these files and make sure it’s not a significant fraction of the amount of memory you actually have!

    By the way, there used to be something called a sticky bit that did something like this. If by some chance your platform supports it, just set it on all the files used. (Although it traditionally caused the files to be saved to swap, which on a modern system won’t make things any faster.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I can't understand the operation of the readlink systemcall in Linux. Can anyone explain
Can anyone explain to me what this means? Run-Time Check Failure #0 - The
Can anyone explain the difference between the types mentioned above and some sample usage
Can anyone explain why the following code does not compile (on g++ (GCC) 3.2.3
Can anyone explain what the target oldconfig does exactly in the Linux kernel makefile?
Can anyone explain how index files are loaded in memory while searching? Is the
Can anyone explain what this mod_rewrite rule is doing? I'm trying to comment the
Can anyone explain what advantages there are to using a tool like MSBuild (or
Can anyone explain why following code won't compile? At least on g++ 4.2.4. And
Can anyone explain in simple words what First and Second Level caching in Hibernate/NHibernate

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.