Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 594907
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T16:00:15+00:00 2026-05-13T16:00:15+00:00

Can anyone point out the flaw in this code? I’m retrieving some HTML with

  • 0

Can anyone point out the flaw in this code? I’m retrieving some HTML with TcpClient. NetworkStream.Read() never seems to finish when talking to an IIS server. If I go use the Fiddler proxy instead, it works fine, but when talking directly to the target server the .read() loop won’t exit until the connection exceptions out with an error like “the remote server has closed the connection”.

internal TcpClient Client { get; set; }

/// bunch of other code here...

try
{

NetworkStream ns = Client.GetStream();
StreamWriter sw = new StreamWriter(ns);

sw.Write(request);
sw.Flush();

byte[] buffer = new byte[1024];

int read=0;

try
{
    while ((read = ns.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length)) > 0)
    {
        response.AppendFormat("{0}", Encoding.ASCII.GetString(buffer, 0, read));
    }
}
catch //(SocketException se)
{

}
finally
{
    Close();
}

Update

In the debugger, I can see the entire response coming through immediately and being appended to my StringBuilder (response). It just appears that the connection isn’t being closed when the server is done sending the response, or my code isn’t detecting it.

Conclusion
As has been said here, it’s best to take advantage of the offerings of the protocol (in the case of HTTP, the Content-Length header) to determine when a transaction is complete. However, I’ve found that not all pages have content-length set. So, I’m now using a hybrid solution:

  1. For ALL transactions, set the request’s Connection header to “close”, so that the server is discouraged from keeping the socket open. This improves the chances that the server will close the connection when it is through responding to your request.

  2. If Content-Length is set, use it to determine when a request is complete.

  3. Else, set the NetworkStream’s RequestTimeout property to a large, but reasonable, value like 1 second. Then, loop on NetworkStream.Read() until either a) the timeout occurs, or b) you read fewer bytes than you asked for.

Thanks to everyone for their excellent and detailed responses.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T16:00:16+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 4:00 pm

    Not sure if this is helpful or not but with HTTP 1.1 the underlying connection to the server might not be closed so maybe the stream doesn’t get closed either? The idea being that you can reuse the connection to send a new request. I think you have to use the content-length. Alternatively use the WebClient or WebRequest classes instead.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 450k
  • Answers 450k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer ="user.f" & ROW() or ="user.f" & ROW()-3 should do the… May 15, 2026 at 8:37 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer As it turns out, django non-rel uses its own remote… May 15, 2026 at 8:37 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer That typedef declares a type pointing to a struct, the… May 15, 2026 at 8:37 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.