Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 133551
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T06:27:11+00:00 2026-05-11T06:27:11+00:00

Can anyone think of a reason to do this: SELECT * FROM TableA ORDER

  • 0

Can anyone think of a reason to do this:

SELECT * FROM TableA ORDER BY cast(cast(RealColumnA as nvarchar(50))as float) –where RealColumnA is defined as real in the table

A former developer of mine insisted this was necessary to get reals to sort correctly. Can anyone think of a reason that may be true?

The cast in the orderby clause is a big performance killer. But I need to be sure it is not necessary before I remove it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T06:27:12+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:27 am

    Remove it. ORDER BY is what you expect it to be. And it certainly would be a performance killer.

    Rule #1 about SQL. Question (and test) all your (and other peoples’) assumptions. (Especially weird ones like this.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

can anyone think of a better way to do this? [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] public ActionResult SaveAction()
Can anyone think of a reason not use the ASP.NET membership providers in a
Here's a brain-twister for the SQL guys - can anyone think of a reason
Can anyone think of a good solution for getting IOC into a console application?
Can anyone think of a good way to allow the server to notify the
Can anyone think of a (preferably quick) way to move the data() attached to
I wonder if anyone can think of a good technique to enable any arbitrary
Can anyone give me a scenario where they think busy cursors are justified? I
I think I'm losing it, can anyone explain why am I experiencing the following:
Can anyone help on how can I do to send the data from a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.