Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8111163
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T02:00:27+00:00 2026-06-06T02:00:27+00:00

Can I implement a constructor in an ASPX page without a Codebehind file? I

  • 0

Can I implement a constructor in an ASPX page without a Codebehind file?

I have a page “test.aspx” and I try to include a constructor:

<%@ Page Language="C#" %>
<script runat="server">
    public dd_prop_test_aspx() : base() { /* Do stuff */ }
</script>

But, the runtime compiler gives me an error:

CS0111: Type ‘ASP.test_aspx’ already defines a member called ‘test_aspx’ with the same parameter types

Line 558:        [System.Diagnostics.DebuggerNonUserCodeAttribute()]
Line 559:        public test_aspx() {
Line 560:            string[] dependencies;

Can I specify a directive to not generate a constructor automatically (as it appears that the compiler does)? Or, do I have another way of working around this?

In the end, I would like to set variables in the class before Page_PreInit, so if a workaround exists without using constructors, that would work, too.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T02:00:29+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 2:00 am

    Although you cannot redeclare the constructor, you are free to override any method from a <script runat="server"> tag, as long as you don’t override it in the code beside as well. And, you can also add page event handlers (same restrictions apply) like Page_PreInit.

    As you can use both the page event and the override at the same time, you might be able to inject code in advance:

    <script runat="server">
        void Page_PreInit(object sender, EventArgs e) 
        {
            Response.Write("First?");
        }
    
        protected override void OnPreInit(EventArgs e)
        {
            base.OnPreInit(e); // implicitly calls Page_PreInit
            Response.Write("Second!");
        }
    </script>
    

    So if you are using Page_PreInit in your code behind as a page event handler, you can use the override of OnPreInit in your .aspx and put your code before the call to base.OnPreInit(e).

    If you’re overriding OnPreInit in your code behind, you can declare a Page_PreInit in your .aspx and it depends on where you call base.OnPreInit(e) before your code behind logic or after.

    In other words: you have full control over when it happens.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

***how can you implement the constructor without naming or needing the class such as
How to implement php constructor that can accept different number of parameters? Like class
I have function-constructor. I want to control what function (object) can call it. Here'e
I can implement both variants - it's easy. But I'm interested: what approach is
How can implement reordring in winforms datagridview by using the feature of drag and
Can someone please tell me how I can implement the following line of pseudo-code.
Anyone knows how i can implement re-arrangable divs (Drag the divs around on the
How I can implement dynamic Jtree, which shows created instances of clases? For example,
I know that classes can implement various special methods, such as __iter__ , __setitem__
How I can implement Background Processing in asp.net. Can anyone give a small and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.