Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6092009
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T12:23:37+00:00 2026-05-23T12:23:37+00:00

can i make this loop continue in such a way that after last item

  • 0

can i make this loop continue in such a way that after last item in listbox to go to the first one and so on…

private void backgroundWorker1_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
    BackgroundWorker worker = sender as BackgroundWorker;
    for (int i = listBox1.Items.Count - 1; i >= 0; i--)
    {
        {
            if (worker.CancellationPending == true)
            {
                e.Cancel = true;
                break;
            }
            else
            {
                string queryhere = listBox1.Items[i].ToString();
                this.SetTextappend("" + queryhere + "\n");
                System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(500);
                worker.ReportProgress(i * 1);
            }
        }
    }
}

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you for all the answers

it seems that my list was going backwads so i must replace

 for (int i = listBox1.Items.Count - 1; i >= 0; i--)

with

 for (int i=0;i<ListBox1.Items.Count;i++)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T12:23:37+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 12:23 pm

    Something like this ?

    BackgroundWorker worker = sender as BackgroundWorker;
    bool go = true;
    while(go)
    {
        for (int i = listBox1.Items.Count - 1; i >= 0; i--)
        {
            {
                if (worker.CancellationPending == true)
                {
                    e.Cancel = true;
                    go = false;
                    break;
                }
                else
                {
                    string queryhere = listBox1.Items[i].ToString();
                    this.SetTextappend("" + queryhere + "\n");
                    System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(500);
                    worker.ReportProgress(i * 1);
                }
            }
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

How is it that tools like this one can make an ajax style call
Now that I can make useful user controls in WPF (thanks to this stackoverflow
I can't for the life of me find a way to make this work.
I can't seem to figure out why this falls into a loop after getting
Ok, let's see if I can make this make sense. I have a program
How can I make this work? switch(property.PropertyType){ case typeof(Boolean): //doStuff break; case typeof(String): //doOtherStuff
How can I make this java generic cast ? public interface IField { }
You can change the connection string at run-time like this. You make the connection
In C# you can make a block inside of a method that is not
Is this a fair analogy to make? I think I can think of some

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.