Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6868785
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T03:28:37+00:00 2026-05-27T03:28:37+00:00

Can I simply combine index files based on a unique id field, rather then

  • 0

Can I simply combine index files based on a unique id field, rather then run a multiple join in DIH, on DB (which is really slow). In that case I can run simple queries witch are resolved more faster, and after that combine them, hoping that will be more fast and more cost efficient (on DB side). Anybody worked like that?
I found that: artical, but I’m using solr 3.4. Any better solution?
Thanks in advance!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T03:28:38+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 3:28 am

    You can create a Materialized View, instead of doing multiple joins.

    The solution mentioned in the article would work with Solr 4.0 as well.
    However, it is a client side solution and would take more time then the normal approach.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to make an applet which I can simply drag an image. And
For some weeks now I simply can't run gem install in windows. It sticks
According to this site I can simply write $user = getlogin(); but the group
I hate generating an exception for things that I can simply test with an
When you declare a type parameter for the class, you can simply use that
Can you simply delete the directory from your python installation, or are there any
Can I simply use if(myString == nil) For some reason a string that I
I simply can not get Visual Studio 2005 to find the System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager class. Here
This seems to be something obvious but I simply can't find info by googling.
In Python, how can I simply do the equivalent of dictionary.get(key, default) for lists

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.