Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 840561
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T05:38:38+00:00 2026-05-15T05:38:38+00:00

Can I somehow force a derived class to always call the overridden methods base?

  • 0

Can I somehow force a derived class to always call the overridden methods base?

public class BaseClass
{
    public virtual void Update()
    {
        if(condition)
        {
            throw new Exception("..."); // Prevent derived method to be called
        }
    }
}

And then in a derived class :

public override void Update()
{
    base.Update(); // Forced call

    // Do any work
}

I’ve searched and found a suggestion to use a non-virtual Update() but also a protected virtual UpdateEx(). It just doesn’t feel very neat, isn’t there any better way?

I hope you get the question and I am sorry for any bad English.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T05:38:39+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 5:38 am

    Use the template method pattern – don’t override the base method which needs to do some work, override one specific bit, which can either be abstract or a no-op in the base class. (The decision about whether to make it a no-op or abstract is usually fairly obvious – does the base class make sense on its own, as a concrete class?)

    It sounds like this is basically the pattern you’ve found with UpdateEx – although it’s usually UpdateImpl or something similar in my experience. There’s nothing wrong with this as a pattern, in my view – it avoids any idea of forcing all derived classes to write the same code to call the base method.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 511k
  • Answers 511k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer As simple as: var values = ""; $('#see, #saw').click(function() {… May 16, 2026 at 5:23 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think unifications of two (in this case completely different)… May 16, 2026 at 5:23 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The difference between the two methods does not seem to… May 16, 2026 at 5:23 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

sorry for being dumb here, but I failed to see why these tools can
In the ViewModel: SelectSafetyContacts = new SelectList(subcontractRepository.GetContacts(Subcontract.company_id), contact_id, contact_name, Subcontract.safety_contact); In the Repository: public
I have the following problem with my C program: Somewhere is a stack overflow.
When coding in C# I like not to handle exceptions because it makes it
I'm using URL routing (with WebForms) in the following format: http://host/project/{projectid}/{pageName} Another option is
I've written a simple game-like app in WPF. The number of objects drawn is
I'm doing a little rails app for a prototype. I started off using a
I'm trying to create a view where I want a column to be only
Is it possible to pause a process, save the memory contents to a file,
I'm updating a Java Swing application to support the user switching the app's font

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.