Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3678830
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T03:23:17+00:00 2026-05-19T03:23:17+00:00

Can I synclock effectively on an object stored in the cache? Like: SyncLock System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Cache(Some

  • 0

Can I synclock effectively on an object stored in the cache?

Like:

SyncLock System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Cache("Some Object")
    'do some stuff that is threadsafe on this cached object'
End SyncLock

Will this stop another thread from modifying that cached object?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T03:23:17+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 3:23 am

    For the standard cache, yes. But it won’t stop another thread replacing the object in the cache – you’ll need to use a separate sync object for that. And if you happen to be using a distributed cache (e.g. Velocity) then it’s not necessarily reliable either.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Can somebody point me to a resource that explains how to go about having
can you recommend some good ASP.NET tutorials or a good book? Should I jump
Can a LINQ enabled app run on a machine that only has the .NET
Can anyone tell me how I can display a status message like 12 seconds
Can you suggest some good MVC framework for perl -- one I am aware
I have a couple of buttons that users can click to load content with
I'm getting an Out of Index Error when adding an Object to a System.Collections.Generic.List
I'm using Enterprise Library 3.1 for logging exceptions for some web application. All exceptions
Can I connect to a Ubuntu server, that is running MySQL using ADO.NET or
Can anyone (maybe an XSL-fan?) help me find any advantages with handling presentation of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.