Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6683749
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T04:51:28+00:00 2026-05-26T04:51:28+00:00

Can I use clean Python 3 super() syntax in Python 2.5.6? Maybe with some

  • 0

Can I use clean Python 3 super() syntax in Python 2.5.6?
Maybe with some kind of __future__ import?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T04:51:29+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 4:51 am

    You cannot use a bare super() call that contains no type/class. Nor can you implement a replacement for it that will work. Python 3.x contains special support to enable bare super() calls (it places a __class__ cell variable in all functions defined within a class – see PEP 3135


    Update

    As of Python 2.6+, bare super() calls can be used via the future Python package. See posita’s answer for an explanation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In C#, if I want to deterministically clean up non-managed resources, I can use
You can use ftplib for full FTP support in Python. However the preferred way
I known python can use pipe to communicate between two process of py. But,
I've noticed that I can not use all unicode characters in my python source
Fedora Core 9 includes Python 2.5.1. I can use YUM to get latest and
I'm using BackgroundWorker for the first time, and use is not entirely clear. Can
You can use more than one css class in an HTML tag in current
You can use a standard dot notation or a method call in Objective-C to
I can use properties of an Excel Worksheet to tell if the worksheet is
You can use SelectFolder() to get a folder or GetOpenFolderitem(filter as string) to get

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.