Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8545257
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T12:45:08+00:00 2026-06-11T12:45:08+00:00

Can some one let me know why I am getting this error and how

  • 0

Can some one let me know why I am getting this error and how I can fix it?

Here is the code

What I am trying to do is remove the rows that associated 1’s if the column of that one’s less than 10

a0=rep(1,40)
a=rep(0:1,20)
b=c(rep(1,20),rep(0,20))
c0=c(rep(0,12),rep(1,28))
c1=c(rep(1,5),rep(0,35))
c2=c(rep(1,8),rep(0,32))
c3=c(rep(1,23),rep(0,17))
c4=c(rep(1,6),rep(0,34))
x=matrix(cbind(a0,a,b,c0,c1,c2,c3,c4),nrow=40,ncol=8)
nam <- paste("V",2:9,sep="")
colnames(x)<-nam
dat <- cbind(y=rnorm(40,50,7),x)
#===================================
toSum <- colSums(dat)
Col <- Val <- NULL
for(i in 1:length(toSum)){
if(toSum[i]<10){
Col <- c(Col,colnames(dat)[i])
Val <- c(Val,toSum[i])}
}
cs <- colSums(dat) < 10
indx <- dat[,which(cs)]==0
for(i in 1:dim(indx)[2]){
datnw <- dat[indx[,i],]
dat <- datnw}
datnw2 <- dat[, -which(cs)]

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T12:45:09+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 12:45 pm

    If I understand correctly what you’re trying to achieve, you might best write it this way:

    cs <- colSums(dat) < 10
    dat[rowSums(dat[,cs]) == 0, !cs]
    

    This means: for any column with sum less than 10 (called a “small column” hereafter), drop any row which has a 1 in that column. So you only keep rows which have a zero in all those small columns. You drop the small columns as well, as they would only contain zeros in any case.

    In your code, indx is a logical data frame with 40 rows, one for each row of input, and one column for each small column in the input. You use the first column of idx to remove the rows with a 1 in the first short column. This results in a new value for dat, which is a few rows shorter than the original. In the next iteration of the loop, you use the second logical vector in an attempt to remove more rows. But this won’t work: after the first iteration, dat has less than 40 rows, but the second column still has all 40 rows. This is what’s causing the error: you’re subscripting a vector of less than 40 elements with a logical vector of length 40.

    You could combine the three columns of your indx into a single vector suitable to subscript the rows of interest using the following expression:

    apply(indx, 1, all)
    

    This will have a TRUE value in its result for exactly those rows which have TRUE in each column. However, I guess I’d prefer my code above over this, as it is much shorter to write. The most likely reason to prefer the latter is if your data frame may contain negative number, so that a row sum of zero does not imply an all-zero row. Not a problem in your example data.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

First of all, I know that the error I am getting can be resolved
Can someone let me know what is the difference between this and jQuery(this) ?
Can some one please explain why this loop never 'breaks' and goes on forever
Hopefully I can explain this well enough, but please let me know if more
Afternoon, I am getting the following error, and cant work out why... Can some
Can someone please let me know how to get values from several input fields?
Can someone please let me know the location to get the Java7 from IBM
Hoping someone can clear this up for me. Let's say I have 2 globals:
Can some one please tell me why exactly classes were introduced in C++. Are
Can some one clarify the space complexity of Node Relationship and property in the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.