Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 203235
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T17:21:38+00:00 2026-05-11T17:21:38+00:00

Can someone explain mathematical induction to prove a recursive method? I am a freshmen

  • 0

Can someone explain mathematical induction to prove a recursive method? I am a freshmen computer science student and I have not yet taken Calculus (I have had up through Trig). I kind of understand it but I have trouble when asked to write out an induction proof for a recursive method.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T17:21:38+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:21 pm

    Here is a explanation by example:

    Let’s say you have the following formula that you want to prove:

    sum(i | i <- [1, n]) = n * (n + 1) / 2
    

    This formula provides a closed form for the sum of all integers between 1 and n.

    We will start by proving the formula for the simple base case of n = 1. In this case, both sides of the formula reduce to 1. This in turn means that the formula holds for n = 1.

    Next, we will prove that if the formula holds for a value n, then it holds for the next value of n (or n + 1). In other words, if the following is true:

    sum(i | i <- [1, n]) = n * (n + 1) / 2
    

    Then the following is also true:

    sum(i | i <- [1, n + 1]) = (n + 1) * (n + 2) / 2
    

    To do so, let’s start with the first side of the last formula:

    s1 = sum(i | i <- [1, n + 1]) = sum(i | i <- [1, n]) + (n + 1)
    

    That is, the sum of all integers between 1 and n + 1 is equal to the sum of integers between 1 and n, plus the last term n + 1.

    Since we are basing this proof on the condition that the formula holds for n, we can write:

    s1 = n * (n + 1) / 2 + (n + 1) = (n + 1) * (n + 2) / 2 = s2
    

    As you can see, we have arrived at the second side of the formula we are trying to prove, which means that the formula does indeed hold.

    This finishes the inductive proof, but what does it actually mean?

    1. The formula is correct for n = 0.
    2. If the formula is correct for n, then it is correct for n + 1.

    From 1 and 2, we can say: if the formula is correct for n = 0, then it is correct for 0 + 1 = 1. Since we proved the case of n = 0, then the case of n = 1 is indeed correct.

    We can repeat this above process again. The case of n = 1 is correct, then the case of n = 2 is correct. This reasoning can go ad infinitum; the formula is correct for all integer values of n >= 1.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 90k
  • Answers 91k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think it could be done by taking a backtrace… May 11, 2026 at 6:10 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Just to be clear, when people mention DelegateCommand and RelayCommand,… May 11, 2026 at 6:10 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You should use a linked list. Adding an item to… May 11, 2026 at 6:10 pm

Related Questions

Since a lot of these sites found on google use mathematical notation and I
Can someone explain the mechanics of a jump table and why is would be
Can someone explain to me the advantages of using an IOC container over simply
Can someone explain this result to me. The first test succeeds but the second
Can someone explain what exactly the string 0 but true means in Perl? As

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.