Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 528525
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T08:59:45+00:00 2026-05-13T08:59:45+00:00

Can someone explain to me the importance of using function wrappers (ie: when assigning

  • 0

Can someone explain to me the importance of using function wrappers (ie: when assigning onclick functionality)? I know I should, but I don’t fully understand why…

Example:
It’s my understanding that this:

$(callingImg)[0].setAttribute("onclick", "function(){removeChildren(this);}");

is better than this:

$(callingImg)[0].setAttribute("onclick", "removeChildren(this)");
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T08:59:45+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:59 am

    One of the most common uses of function wrappers is to maintain or lock in that function’s context. For example, if you have some object and you want to use one of it’s method’s as the onclick handler for a given element:

    someElement.onclick = someObject.someMethod;
    

    If someObject.someMethod makes any references to this, instead of this pointing to someObject it will instead point to someElement because the context has changed. By wrapping the someObject.someMethod

    someElement.onclick = function() { someObject.someMethod() };
    

    you are still executing someMethod as a method of someObject rather than as a method of someElement.

    However, if the event handler method never makes any references to this, then a wrapper isn’t needed.

    From the example code that you posted, if you just did

    $(callingImg)[0].setAttribute("onclick", removeChildren(this));
    

    removeChildren(this) would be executed immediately and it’s return value would be assigned as the onclick handler.


    Here’s some sample code to illustrate what’s happening

    var FakeElement = function() {
        this.name    = "FakeElement";
        this.onclick = function() {};
    };
    
    var FakeEventHandler = function() {
        this.name = "FakeHandlerObject";
        this.clickHandler = function() {
            console.log("`this` = ", this.name);
        };
    };
    
    var e = new FakeElement(); 
    var h = new FakeEventHandler();
    
    // Normal usage, `this` points to instance of `h`
    console.info("h.clickHandler();");
    h.clickHandler();
    
    // Context of this is changed to `e` instead of `h`
    console.info("e.onclick = h.clickHandler;");
    e.onclick = h.clickHandler;
    e.onclick();
    
    // Wrapped to maintain proper context of `this` within `h`
    console.info("e.onclick = function() { h.clickHandler(); };");
    e.onclick = function() { h.clickHandler(); };
    e.onclick();
    
    // Executed immediately and returns `null` causing an error in `e.onclick();`
    console.info("e.onclick = h.clickHandler();");
    e.onclick = h.clickHandler();
    e.onclick();
    

    Output:

    h.clickHandler();
    `this` = FakeHandlerObject
    
    e.onclick = h.clickHandler;
    `this` = FakeElement
    
    e.onclick = function() { h.clickHandler(); };
    `this` = FakeHandlerObject
    
    e.onclick = h.clickHandler();
    `this` = FakeHandlerObject
    

    As a side note, it looks like you’re using jQuery. If that’s the case, you can simply do

    $($(callingImg)[0]).click(function() {
        removeChildren(this);
    });
    

    better still, if there is always one callingImg or you want to apply the same click handler to every callingImg, you can just do

    $(callingImg).click(function() {
        removeChildren(this);
    });
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 276k
  • Answers 276k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you are behind a proxy, you need to configure… May 13, 2026 at 2:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is providing an inline (anonymous) subclass of the Stream… May 13, 2026 at 2:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I assume that it's matching the signature that takes a… May 13, 2026 at 2:50 pm

Related Questions

We allocate memory in C using malloc and in C++ using new. I know
I'm building an intranet web app with an Oracle back end. The Oracle DB
I'm working on a simple project to create tables and insert data into them,
In his 2005 email to the Linux Kernel mailing list , Linus Torvalds is
I have a software app and I've hit an important milestone, version 2.0. I

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.