Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 635497
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T20:24:39+00:00 2026-05-13T20:24:39+00:00

can someone tell if the code below would work fine? class CriticalSection{ int iProcessId,

  • 0

can someone tell if the code below would work fine?

class CriticalSection{

int iProcessId, iCounter=0;

public static boolean[] freq = new boolean[Global.iParameter[2]];

int busy;

//constructors

CriticalSection(){}

CriticalSection(int iPid){
    this.iProcessId = iPid;
}

int freqAvailable(){

for(int i=0; i<
Global.iParameter[2]; i++){

        if(freq[i]==true){
            //this means that there is no frequency available and the request will be dropped
            iCounter++;
        }   
    }
    if(iCounter == freq.length)
        return 3;

    BaseStaInstance.iNumReq++;
    return enterCritical();
}

int enterCritical(){

    int busy=0;
    for(int i=0; i<Global.iParameter[2]; i++){
        if(freq[i]==true){
            freq[i] = false;
            break;
        }
    }
    //implement a thread that will execute the critical section simultaneously as the (contd down)
    //basestation leaves it critical section and then generates another request
    UseFrequency freqInUse = new UseFrequency;
    busy = freqInUse.start(i);

//returns control back to the main program

    return 1;   
}
}

class UseFrequency extends Thread {

    int iFrequency=0;

     UseFrequency(int i){
        this.iFrequency = i;
     }
     //this class just allows the frequency to be used in parallel as the other basestations carry on making requests
    public void run() {
        try {
            sleep(((int) (Math.random() * (Global.iParameter[5] - Global.iParameter[4] + 1) ) + Global.iParameter[4])*1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) { }
    }

    CriticalSection.freq[iFrequency] = true;

    stop();

}  
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T20:24:40+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:24 pm

    No, this code will not even compile. For example, your “UseFrequency” class has a constructor and a run() method, but then you have two lines CriticalSection.freq[iFrequency] = true; and
    stop(); that aren’t in any method body – they are just sitting there on their own.

    If you get the code to compile it still will not work like you expect because you have multiple threads and no concurrency control. That means the different threads can “step on eachother” and corrupt shared data, like your “freq” array. Any time you have multiple threads you need to protect access to shared variables with a synchronized block. The Java Tutorial on concurrency explains this here http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/concurrency/index.html

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 387k
  • Answers 387k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I was able to figure this out, the answer is… May 15, 2026 at 12:13 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I doubt there are very many tutorials out there on… May 15, 2026 at 12:13 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Try the following untested code: XmlDocument xmldoc = new XmlDocument();… May 15, 2026 at 12:13 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.