Can someone tell me why Objects serialized with SoapFormatter are more likely to successfully
traverse firewalls than BinaryFormatter?
Thanks
Can someone tell me why Objects serialized with SoapFormatter are more likely to successfully
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Can someone tell me why Objects serialized with SoapFormatter are more likely to successfully
traverse firewalls than BinaryFormatter?
Thanks
Are you sure you’re not talking about the difference between using binary remoting which needs to use a custom binary protocol, and SOAP which usually goes over HTTP? Generally firewalls are pretty good with HTTP, but you have to have permission to punch a hole through for something like remoting.