Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8775715
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T18:52:28+00:00 2026-06-13T18:52:28+00:00

Can we use Unity interception/extensions/custom proxy to perform this? // psuedo-code using (var childContainer

  • 0

Can we use Unity interception/extensions/custom proxy to perform this?

// psuedo-code
using (var childContainer = new container.CreateChildContainer())
using (var scope = new TransactionScope())
{
  childContainer.Resolve<TMyService>().PerformCall(...);
  scope.Complete();
}

Currently the above code is implemented as a WCF behaviour. We now have classes that access this service layer directly rather then making WCF calls and need this behaviour. The interesting part is we need to create a child container inside the unity interception.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T18:52:29+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 6:52 pm

    Yes. I don’t see why you couldn’t. However…

    although the use of interception often loosens the need to have a clean and SOLID design, when you want to do this, you still need a SOLID design.

    I’ve written about these kind of designs that enable this here, and what it comes down to is that you will have model the operations you want to wrap behind a design, such as an ICommandHandler<T> with a Handle(T) method. With such a design, you can create a decorator (or in Unity’s case an interceptor) that wraps a real class with a class that adds a child container like this:

    public class ChildContainerCommandHandlerDecorator<T>
        : ICommandHandler<T>
    {
        private readonly ICommandHandler<T> decorated;
        private readonly Container container;
    
        public ChildContainerCommandHandlerDecorator(
            ICommandHandler<T> decorated, Container container)
        {
            this.decorated = decorated;
            this.container = container;
        }
    
        public void Handle(T command)
        {
            using (container.CreateChildContainer())
            {
                this.decorated.Handle(command);
            }
        }
    }
    

    And a decorator that adds a transaction scope like this:

    public class TransactionCommandHandlerDecorator<T>
        : ICommandHandler<T>
    {
        private readonly ICommandHandler<T> decorated;
    
        public TransactionCommandHandlerDecorator(
            ICommandHandler<T> decorated)
        {
            this.decorated = decorated;
        }
    
        public void Handle(T command)
        {
            using (var scope = new TransactionScope())
            {
                this.decorated.Handle(command);
    
                scope.Complete();
            }
        }
    }
    

    By wrapping real handlers in both decorators, you can extend handlers with this behavior. Of course, decorators is a concept that Unity is unable to handle, but you can easily rewrite this using interceptors when working with Unity, but again, good design is your only friend here.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'd like to use interception with Unity, here is my code : UnityContainer container
I can use this maven plugin maven-jaxb-plugin to generate Java Classes from XSD file.
I can use the PRINT statement in a stored procedure to debug my code.
Can someone provide the XML configuration I should use with Microsoft Unity application block
Is there a framework or a code tutorial that shows how one can use
Can I use FlexUnit to unit test a File Upload and delete? Are those
I can use the following to get the contents of a folder with no
Users can use their Google, Facebook or Twitter account to login to a site
I can use .button() to create beautiful submit buttons, but the rest of the
I can use FireFox and FireBug, in a pane, I can open a .css

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.