Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 959953
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T01:06:19+00:00 2026-05-16T01:06:19+00:00

Can you describe difference between two ways of string concatenation: simple __add__ operator and

  • 0

Can you describe difference between two ways of string concatenation: simple __add__ operator and %s patterns?
I had some investigation in this question and found %s (in form without using parentheses) a little faster.

Also another question was appeared: why result of 'hell%s' % 'o' refers to another memory region than 'hell%s' % ('o',)?

There is some code example:

l = ['hello', 'hell' + 'o', 'hell%s' % 'o', 'hell%s' % ('o',)]
print [id(s) for s in l]

Result:

[34375618400, 34375618400, 34375618400, 34375626256]

P.S. I know about string interning 🙂

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T01:06:20+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 1:06 am

    Here is a small exercise:

    >>> def f1():
        'hello'
    
    
    >>> def f2():
        'hel' 'lo'
    
    
    >>> def f3():
        'hel' + 'lo'
    
    
    >>> def f4():
        'hel%s' % 'lo'
    
    
    >>> def f5():
        'hel%s' % ('lo',)
    
    
    >>> for f in (f1, f2, f3, f4, f5):
        print(f.__name__)
        dis.dis(f)
    
    
    f1
      1           0 LOAD_CONST               1 (None) 
                  3 RETURN_VALUE         
    f2
      1           0 LOAD_CONST               1 (None) 
                  3 RETURN_VALUE         
    f3
      2           0 LOAD_CONST               3 ('hello') 
                  3 POP_TOP              
                  4 LOAD_CONST               0 (None) 
                  7 RETURN_VALUE         
    f4
      2           0 LOAD_CONST               3 ('hello') 
                  3 POP_TOP              
                  4 LOAD_CONST               0 (None) 
                  7 RETURN_VALUE         
    f5
      2           0 LOAD_CONST               1 ('hel%s') 
                  3 LOAD_CONST               3 (('lo',)) 
                  6 BINARY_MODULO        
                  7 POP_TOP              
                  8 LOAD_CONST               0 (None) 
                 11 RETURN_VALUE         
    

    As you can see, all simple concatenations/formatting are done by compiler. The last function requires more complex formatting and therefore, I guess, is actually executed. Since all those object created at compilation time they all have the same id.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.