Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6683451
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T04:49:23+00:00 2026-05-26T04:49:23+00:00

catch (IOException|SQLException ex) { logger.log(ex); throw ex; } here why is ex implicitly final?

  • 0
catch (IOException|SQLException ex) {
    logger.log(ex);
    throw ex;
}

here why is ex implicitly final? What is the use of making ex implicitly final?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T04:49:24+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 4:49 am

    It’s implicitly final because it does not make sense for you to change the object pointed to by ex, especially in this case where it could be either an IOException or an SQLException, and thus the (static) assignment typing would be difficult to figure out by the compiler.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

If we are to catch specific forms of IOException , or any other kind
I keep hearing that catch (Exception ex) Is bad practise, however, I often use
Does the using catch the exception or throw it? i.e. using (StreamReader rdr =
int i=0; try{ int j = 10/i; } catch(IOException e){} finally{ Console.WriteLine(In finally); Console.ReadLine();
package database; import java.io.IOException; import java.sql.Connection; import java.sql.PreparedStatement; import java.sql.SQLException; import database.Dbconnect; public class
Should I catch exceptions for logging purposes? public foo(..) { try { ... }
I'm trying to catch a ClassCastException when deserializing an object from xml. So, try
How do you catch a custom event raised by a master page? On my
I need to catch the HTML of a ASP.NET just before it is being
Is it possible to catch an error when using JSONP with jQuery? I've tried

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.