Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7516061
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T01:00:56+00:00 2026-05-30T01:00:56+00:00

Chrome is taking the CSS padding from .link_block ul li, even though li.page_icon appears

  • 0

Chrome is taking the CSS padding from .link_block ul li, even though li.page_icon appears afterwards and I’ve included an !important declaration.

I know there are tons of different ways to apply the padding I want, but if anyone could help explain why the link_block class CSS is taking precedent here even though the page_icon class seems more specific and has the !important declaration.

HTML:

 <li class="page_icon">Create New Resume</li>

CSS:

.link_block ul li {
color: #000;
text-decoration:none;
padding: 0px 0px 10px 0px;
font-family:Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif;
}

 li.page_icon {
display:block;
width: 100%;
min-height: 60px;
background-image:url(../../images/page_icon.png);
background-position:top left;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
padding: 0px 0px 0px 50px; !important
margin: 0px 0px 0px 0px;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T01:00:58+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 1:00 am

    First, !important should be before the semicolon, like this:

    padding: 0px 0px 0px 50px !important;
    

    Second, you really shouldn’t using important’s in your CSS. You could solve the problem by giving your lower rule equal specificity as the other rule, and thus the lower rule will be the one that gets applied.

    ul li.page_icon {
        display:block;
        width: 100%;
        min-height: 60px;
        background-image:url(../../images/page_icon.png);
        background-position:top left;
        background-repeat:no-repeat;
        padding: 0px 0px 0px 50px; !important
        margin: 0px 0px 0px 0px;
    }
    

    Here’s a good link on specificity

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

After test driving Google Chrome for 30 minutes or so, I like it, even
I'm curious to know who is testing against Chrome. I am mainly because it
I recently started learning about Chrome Extensions and was taking a look at the
I currently have an issue where Firefox is taking away 1-2 pixels of padding
Chrome v4 supports the placeholder attribute on input[type=text] elements (others probably do too). However,
Google chrome doesn't behave the same as other browsers when encountering this nugget: <?php
Google Chrome and IE8 implement multi-process support for each tab. How would I implement
Is Chrome beeping during a removeAllRanges(); to indicate an error in the code, or
How does Google Chrome command and control multiple cross platform processes and provide a
While browsing with Chrome, I noticed that it responds extremely fast (in comparison with

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.