Home/ Questions/Q 8602893
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-12T02:11:53+00:00

class A { public: int a; A(int x) { a = x; } };

  • 0
class A {
   public:
   int a;
   A(int x)
   {
      a = x;
   }
};

OR

class B {
       public:
       int b;
       B(int x):b(x){}
};

Which one would initialize the object faster ? Or will same code be generated ultimately for both and the time taken to initialize will remain the same ? Or does it depend on the compiler ?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    For POD members, including int, they will be the same, because the member won’t be constructed twice.

    For types with a default constructor, the second will be faster, because the first option is equivalent to:

    A(B x) : a()
{
   a = x;
}

    if a is a member of type B (with a default constructor).

    Note that there are situations where you must use initializer lists: const members, reference members, members of a class-type that don’t have a default constructor.

    POD-member:

    No initializer list:

       A(int x)
001F1430  push        ebp  
001F1431  mov         ebp,esp  
001F1433  sub         esp,0CCh  
001F1439  push        ebx  
001F143A  push        esi  
001F143B  push        edi  
001F143C  push        ecx  
001F143D  lea         edi,[ebp-0CCh]  
001F1443  mov         ecx,33h  
001F1448  mov         eax,0CCCCCCCCh  
001F144D  rep stos    dword ptr es:[edi]  
001F144F  pop         ecx  
001F1450  mov         dword ptr [ebp-8],ecx  
   {
      a = x;
001F1453  mov         eax,dword ptr [this]  
001F1456  mov         ecx,dword ptr [x]  
001F1459  mov         dword ptr [eax],ecx  
   }

    Initializer list:

       A(int x) : a(x)
00E71430  push        ebp  
00E71431  mov         ebp,esp  
00E71433  sub         esp,0CCh  
00E71439  push        ebx  
00E7143A  push        esi  
00E7143B  push        edi  
00E7143C  push        ecx  
00E7143D  lea         edi,[ebp-0CCh]  
00E71443  mov         ecx,33h  
00E71448  mov         eax,0CCCCCCCCh  
00E7144D  rep stos    dword ptr es:[edi]  
00E7144F  pop         ecx  
00E71450  mov         dword ptr [ebp-8],ecx  
00E71453  mov         eax,dword ptr [this]  
00E71456  mov         ecx,dword ptr [x]  
00E71459  mov         dword ptr [eax],ecx

    i.e. identical, & that’s because a isn’t initialized before entry to the constructor body.

    Non-POD member:

    No initializer list:

    00EB1A80  push        ebp  
00EB1A81  mov         ebp,esp  
00EB1A83  sub         esp,0CCh  
00EB1A89  push        ebx  
00EB1A8A  push        esi  
00EB1A8B  push        edi  
00EB1A8C  push        ecx  
00EB1A8D  lea         edi,[ebp-0CCh]  
00EB1A93  mov         ecx,33h  
00EB1A98  mov         eax,0CCCCCCCCh  
00EB1A9D  rep stos    dword ptr es:[edi]  
00EB1A9F  pop         ecx  
00EB1AA0  mov         dword ptr [ebp-8],ecx  
00EB1AA3  mov         ecx,dword ptr [this]  
00EB1AA6  call        B::B (0EB11D6h)  
   {
       a = b;
   }
00EB1AAB  mov         eax,dword ptr [this]  
00EB1AAE  pop         edi  
00EB1AAF  pop         esi  
00EB1AB0  pop         ebx  
00EB1AB1  add         esp,0CCh  
00EB1AB7  cmp         ebp,esp  
00EB1AB9  call        @ILT+315(__RTC_CheckEsp) (0EB1140h)  
00EB1ABE  mov         esp,ebp  
00EB1AC0  pop         ebp  
00EB1AC1  ret         4

    Initializer List:

    A(B b) : a(b)
   {
00841650  push        ebp  
00841651  mov         ebp,esp  
00841653  sub         esp,0CCh  
00841659  push        ebx  
0084165A  push        esi  
0084165B  push        edi  
0084165C  push        ecx  
0084165D  lea         edi,[ebp-0CCh]  
00841663  mov         ecx,33h  
00841668  mov         eax,0CCCCCCCCh  
0084166D  rep stos    dword ptr es:[edi]  
0084166F  pop         ecx  
00841670  mov         dword ptr [ebp-8],ecx  
   }

    i.e. initializer list option is better.

    • 0