Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7745083
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T09:55:28+00:00 2026-06-01T09:55:28+00:00

class apple { public : operator orange () const { cout << operator; }

  • 0
class apple
{
  public :
    operator orange () const { cout << "operator"; }
} ;
class orange
{
  public :
    orange (apple &x ){cout <<"constructor";}
};
void f(orange o)
{
  cout <<"function can accept only oranges ";
}
int main()
{
  apple a;
  f(a);
}

Output:
Compiler Error

Why does this code gives compiler error on g++ compiler? Why isn’t the constructor for orange called when function f is called?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T09:55:29+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 9:55 am

    You have a cyclic dependency:

    class apple
    {
    public :
       operator orange () const { cout << "operator"; } //depends on orange
                                                        //shouldn't compile
    } ;
    class orange
    {
    public :
       orange (apple &x ){cout <<"constructor";} //depends on apple
    };
    

    I’m surprised you’re not getting compiler errors. Anyway, you need to define orange before you define apple, and you don’t need the operator orange:

    class apple;
    class orange
    {
    public :
       orange (apple &x ){cout <<"constructor";}
    };
    class apple
    {
    public :
    };
    

    This should work.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

template<typename T> class ClassVariantVisitor : public boost::static_visitor<T> { public: T operator()(int& i) const {
Function abstraction: public abstract class Function<X, Y> { abstract Y apply(X x); } max
Consider the following class: class MyClass { public: template<class T> typename T::result_type apply(T& func)
I have the following class structure: public class Fruit { } public class Apple
Let's say we have a concrete class Apple . (Apple objects can be instantiated.)
class{ public HashMap<String, String> eachperson; apple(){ this.eachperson.put(thekey,thevalue); } } (Please excuse the public/privates in
I want to have an class like this, public class Apple { public string
In Apple's The Objective-C Programming Language: Defining a Class the section named Redefining self
Apple Mail defines both a class account and a constant account for the rule
com.apple.Dont_Steal_Mac_OS_X is a IOResources provider... Class Inheritance: Dont_Steal_Mac_OS_X : IOService : IORegistryEntry : OSObject

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.