Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 964077
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T01:46:14+00:00 2026-05-16T01:46:14+00:00

class Foo def initialize @bar = [] end def changed_callback puts Bar has been

  • 0
class Foo
  def initialize
    @bar = []
  end

  def changed_callback
    puts "Bar has been changed!"
  end

  def bar
    @bar
  end

  def bar=(a)
    @bar = a
    self.changed_callback() # (hence why this doesn't just use attr_accessor)
  end

  def bar<<(a)
    @bar.push(a)
    self.changed_callback()
  end
end

f = Foo.new()
f.bar = [1,2,3]
  => "Bar has been changed!"
f.bar << 4
  => "Bar has been changed!"
puts f.bar.inspect
  => [1,2,3,4]

Is anything like that possible?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T01:46:15+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 1:46 am

    You need to somehow extend the object returned by Foo#bar with an appropriate #<< method. Something like this, maybe?

    class Foo
      module ArrayProxy
        def <<(other)
          @__foo__.changed_callback
          super
        end
      end
    
      def initialize
        @bar = []
      end
    
      def changed_callback
        puts 'Bar has been changed!'
      end
    
      def bar
        return @bar if @bar.is_a?(ArrayProxy)
        @bar.tap {|bar| bar.extend(ArrayProxy).instance_variable_set(:@__foo__, self) }
      end
    
      def bar=(a)
        @bar = a
        changed_callback # (hence why this doesn't just use attr_accessor)
      end
    
    end
    
    f = Foo.new
    f.bar = [1,2,3]
    #  "Bar has been changed!"
    f.bar << 4
    #  "Bar has been changed!"
    puts f.bar.inspect
    #  => [1,2,3,4]
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 496k
  • Answers 496k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Try putting the div for the floating drag search results… May 16, 2026 at 11:31 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Single quote does not allow variable interpolation, so use double… May 16, 2026 at 11:31 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer First, you do not want to use while (!feof(pFile)) --… May 16, 2026 at 11:31 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

class Foo def initialize(a) puts Hello #{a} end end module Bar def initialize(b) puts
So I have this app require 'tk' class Foo def my_fancy_function puts hello, world!
I have a Rack application that looks like this: class Foo def initialize(app) @app
What's the best way to abstract this pattern: class MyClass attr_accessor :foo, :bar def
Following code works def lab Proc.new { return foo1 }.call return foo2 end puts
Here's the domain classes I'm working with: class Foo { String name, type static
I have a Builder class that lets you add to one of it's instance
I am trying to use IO.popen in order to put (with .puts method) and
Can I create a private instance method that can be called by a class
I have some code in a reusable class that modifies some types. Here's a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.