Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7786291
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T20:23:37+00:00 2026-06-01T20:23:37+00:00

class Foo() { val array // how do I leave initialization till later? def

  • 0

class Foo() {
 val array  // how do I leave initialization till later?
 def initializeArray(size : Int) = array = Array.ofDim[Int](size)
}

The above code won’t compile, so how do I initialize my array at a later time?

Edit

Suppose I need to read a file that has a matrix of integer, and I want to represent the matrix as a two dimensional array. Of course, I am parsing the file inside the Foo class and the dimension of the matrix won’t be known until the parsing is done.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T20:23:38+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 8:23 pm

    One simple way would be to just initialize it to null. To do this you would need to specify a type, Array[Int] and to make it a var (instead of val) so that you could change it later:

    class Foo() {
      var array: Array[Int] = null  // how do I leave initialization till later?
      def initializeArray(size : Int) = array = Array.ofDim[Int](size)
    }
    

    However, this is not very good practice in Scala. It might be better to use an Option:

    class Foo() {
      var array: Option[Array[Int]] = None  // how do I leave initialization till later?
      def initializeArray(size : Int) = array = Some(Array.ofDim[Int](size))
    }
    

    This tells a user, explicitly, that it is possible that array may not be set to anything, and avoids NullPointerExceptions. You can read more about Option on StackOverflow or elsewhere.

    Finally, the best designs in Scala rely on immutable classes. In such a case, you would defer creation of the Foo until you actually know what you want to put in it. However, without knowing anything else about your design, it’s hard to say how best to set this up.

    EDIT: Based on your description, I would separate your design into two parts: a method for parsing the file, and an immutable Foo for storing the final result.

    class Foo(array: Array[Int]) {
    
    }
    
    object Foo {
      def fromFile() = {
         val array: Array[Int] = /* parse file into the right structure */
         new Foo(array)
      }
    }
    

    Then you could just say:

    val foo = Foo.fromFile(filename)
    

    and the foo would be an complete, immutable Foo.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've got this code that works: def testTypeSpecialization: String = { class Foo[T] def
Consider the following: object Main { case class Foo(bar: Int) extends FooList { val
Consider the following code: object U { def foo(s:String) = true } val boolType
Consider this code: class Foo[T : Manifest](val id: String = manifest[T].erasure.getName) I basically want
class Foo { public: void bar(); }; void Foo::bar() { static int n =
class Foo def initialize(a) puts Hello #{a} end end module Bar def initialize(b) puts
class Foo { public static IEnumerable<int> Range(int start, int end) { return Enumerable.Range(start, end);
class Foo { public: Foo() { Foo(1)} Foo(int x, int y = 0):i(x) {}
class Foo { public int A { get; set; } } class Program {
class Foo(bar: String) { import Foo.Bar def this() = this(Bar) // this line fails,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.