Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3672292
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T02:35:27+00:00 2026-05-19T02:35:27+00:00

class myClass { public: void operator++() { // ++myInstance. } void operator++(int) { //

  • 0
class myClass
{
    public:

    void operator++()
    {
        // ++myInstance.
    }

    void operator++(int)
    {
        // myInstance++.
    }
}

Besides letting the compiler distinguish between myInstance++ and ++myInstance, is the optional int argument in operator++ actually for anything? If so, what is it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T02:35:27+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 2:35 am

    As @Konrad said, the int argument is not used for anything, other than to distingush between the pre-increment and post-increment forms.

    Note however that your operators should return a value. Pre-increment should return a reference, and post-increment should return by-value. To wit:

    class myClass
    {
    
    public:
    
    myClass& operator++()
    {
        // ++myInstance. 
        return * this;   
    }
    myClass operator++(int)
    {
        // myInstance++.
        myClass orig = *this;
        ++(*this);  // do the actual increment
        return orig;
    }
    };
    

    EDIT:

    As Gene Bushuyev mentions correctly below, it is not an absolute requirement that operator++ return non-void. However, in most cases (I can’t think of an exception) you’ll need to. Especially if you want to assign the results of the operator to some other value, such as:

    myClass a;
    myClass x = a++;
    

    EDIT2:

    Also, with the postimcrement version, you will return the object before it was incremented. This is typically done using a local temporary. See above.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

public class MyClass { public int Age; public int ID; } public void MyMethod()
Given this definition: [UniqueId(Ident)] public class MyClass : MyBase { public int Ident{ get;
I have a class like this: public class myClass { public List<myOtherClass> anewlist =
In java <1.5, constants would be implemented like this public class MyClass { public
I'm de/serializing an object like so: public class myClass : ISerializable { public List<OType>
I have a generic class public MyClass<TContext, T> where TContext : DataContext that effectively
Suppose I have a class public class MyClass { private Set<String> set = new
I have the following structure public class MyClass : MyBaseClass<System.Int32> { } In a
If I set a Friend-level scope on a setter, like this... Public Class MyClass
I have got a template class as follows: class MyClass<T> { T field; public

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.