Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6932363
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T11:41:47+00:00 2026-05-27T11:41:47+00:00

class NonCopyable { public: NonCopyable() = default; NonCopyable(const NonCopyable&) = delete; NonCopyable& operator=(const NonCopyable&)

  • 0
class NonCopyable
{
public:
    NonCopyable() = default;
    NonCopyable(const NonCopyable&) = delete;
    NonCopyable& operator=(const NonCopyable&) = delete;
};

I have tried the above code with VS2010 and it doesn’t pass the compilation.

1>c:\temp\app1\app1\app1.cpp(12): error C2065: 'default' : undeclared identifier
1>c:\temp\app1\app1\app1.cpp(12): error C2253: 'NonCopyable' : pure specifier or abstract override specifier only allowed on virtual function
1>c:\temp\app1\app1\app1.cpp(13): error C2059: syntax error : ';'
1>c:\temp\app1\app1\app1.cpp(13): error C2238: unexpected token(s) preceding ';'
1>c:\temp\app1\app1\app1.cpp(14): error C2059: syntax error : ';'
1>c:\temp\app1\app1\app1.cpp(14): error C2238: unexpected token(s) preceding ';'
1>
1>Build FAILED.

Question> As far as I know, default and delete are new features for C++0x.
Does VS2010 support those new standard?

// updated — it is supported with gcc version 4.5.2 //

// gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4)

$ ~/Documents/C++ $ g++ -o t2 t2.cpp -std=c++0x
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T11:41:48+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 11:41 am

    No, sadly VC2010 does not. It doesn’t even support automatically generated move constructors.

    Here is a list of C++11 features VC2010 supports. Note that some of them are only partially supported.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following: typedef std::function<void(const EventArgs&)> event_type; class Event : boost::noncopyable { private:
class NotCopyable { public: NotCopyable() { } private: NotCopyable(const NotCopyable&); NotCopyable& operator = (const
I have a question about the following code: class MyClass : private boost::noncopyable {
Suppose you have a class NonCopyable class NonCopyable { public: NonCopyable(int n){} ~NonCopyable(){} [...]
I have such singleton structure: // Hpp class Root : public boost::noncopyable { public:
I have a basic_iostream derived class like this: class MyStream : public std::basic_iostream< char
I have a class that creates an object inside one public method. The object
I simply want a class that does this: class cleanup : boost::noncopyable { public:
For example: class Foo : boost::noncopyable { // ... }; class Bar : public
Which practice would you recommend, and why? class Foo : public boost::noncopyable {}; vs.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.