Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8945243
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T12:12:16+00:00 2026-06-15T12:12:16+00:00

class Pair<A,B> { final A first; final B sec; Pair(A f, B s){ this.first

  • 0
class Pair<A,B> {
    final A first;
    final B sec;

    Pair(A f, B s){
        this.first = f;
        this.sec = s;
    }
}

Is there a way to ensure that A and B are immutable types ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T12:12:17+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 12:12 pm

    No. There is no way to identify, let alone bound, a type as being immutable.

    You could create a marker interface (one without methods, like Serializable) that is used in your project to identify immutable classes, and have your team adhere to it.

    For example:

    interface Immutable {}
    
    class Pair<A extends Immutable, B extends Immutable> {
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This class is intended to represent a pair of objects of arbitrary types -
I am having to write this program for school that multiplies a pair of
class pair<U,V>{ U first; V second; public pair() { first = new U(); //error
I use this code to define my class in GAE Python: class Pair(db.Model): find
I have the following class: Public Class Pair(Of T1, T2) Public Property First As
Is there available a proven Java Pair class implementation? I mean readily available, widely
I have defined a ConfigurationProperty class, which is basicly a key-value pair (with key
I wrote this little code std::map<int,template<class T>> map_; map_.insert(make_pair<int,message>(myMsg.id,myMsg)); but the compiler doesn't seem
class A: pass def b(self): print('b') A.b = b a = A() At this
I made my own class template to maintain pair of elements of any type

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.