Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9155151
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T12:32:38+00:00 2026-06-17T12:32:38+00:00

class subscriber { public: virtual void update() = 0; } class entity : public

  • 0
 class subscriber
 {
 public:
      virtual void update() = 0;
 }

 class entity : public subsriber
 {
 public:
      virtual void update() = 0;
 }

 class myObject : public entity
 {
 public:
      virtual void update()
       {
        do_things();
       }
 }

 subscriber * ptr = new myObject; //will use shared_ptr, but here i want simplicity

  ptr->update(); 

The question is, will the proper update function (the one implemented in myObject) be called? And is it valid to have 2 pure virtual functions with the same name in one “family”?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T12:32:38+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 12:32 pm

    will the proper update function (the one implemented in myObject) be called?

    Yes, it will be called.

    is it valid to have 2 pure virtual functions with the same name in one “family”?

    The second declaration (i.e. inside the entity class) does not introduce a second pure virtual function into the family: the signatures are identical, so update() is a single virtual function. Moreover, declaring it for the second time is not necessary: entity would remain abstract, and would have access to the update() method even if you removed the second declaration.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

public Class A { public A() { someotherclass.someevent += new EventHandler(HandleEvent); } private void
My program has the following class definition: public sealed class Subscriber { private subscription;
class Widget; std::vector< std::shared_ptr<Widget> > container class Criterium { public: bool operator()(const Widget& left,
Class 1 private void checkDuplicateCustomer(BulkCustomerVO bulkCustomerVO) { PagedDuplicateCustomerVO duplicateCustomerVO = new PagedDuplicateCustomerVO(); duplicateCustomerVO.setCustomer(bulkCustomerVO.getCustomerVO()); duplicateCustomerVO
Why doesn’t this work?! public interface IBus { void Subscribe<T>(ISubscribe<T> subscriber) where T :
I have two models: class Subscription belongs_to :subscriber, :class_name => User belongs_to :subscribable, :polymorphic
Suppose I have a base class named Visitor, and it has 2 subclass Subscriber
At the moment I have the following Command class: Public Class SubscribeCommand Implements ICommand
Why would a 'public event EventHandler cccc' be null? I have a class that's
All implementation of IHttpModule I've seen looks following: class HttpCompressionModule : IHttpModule { public

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.