Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7091623
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T08:12:32+00:00 2026-05-28T08:12:32+00:00

class TestClass CONSTANT = 1 end TestClass::CONSTANT = 2 Apparently you can change value

  • 0
class TestClass
  CONSTANT = 1
end

TestClass::CONSTANT = 2

Apparently you can change value of the constant in Ruby any time. Why are they even called “constants” if you can change them?

What is the purpose of these ‘constants’? How does the ability to change their value make programming easier?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T08:12:33+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 8:12 am

    Well, constants in Ruby are relatively variable. Objects they point to can be swapped (as in your example) and their state can be changed as well.

    class TestClass
      Constant = []
    end
    TestClass::Constant << "no warning at all!"
    

    The only advantage they provide are warnings generated when you make an existing constant point to another object. See “Programming Ruby”, section “Variables and Constants”. It’s old but still valid.

    The purpose for Ruby’s constants to exist is signalling that a given reference shouldn’t be changed. For instance, if you do Math::PI = 3.0 you deserve to be warned.

    Theoretically, you could break compatibility with the original implementation and enforce constants’ immutability. As a result you could achieve a slight performance improvement thanks to optimised method dispatching.

    In the example above you’d know that Constant.is_a? Array so dispatching the << symbol to the actual method could be done only once, on the first execution of that line. The problem is that Ruby enables you to redefine Array#<< thus making the problem more tricky.

    Checking whether various Ruby implementations try to use such optimisation would require some additional research and digging in their documentation or sources.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given the following class: class TestClass { public void SetValue(int value) { Value =
i wonder if there is any difference between class TestClass { private $_var =
Say I have this Ruby code in test.rb module MyModule class TestClassA end class
I can't seem to understand what is going on here: class testclass: def __init__(self):
Consider this: public class TestClass { private String a; private String b; public TestClass()
@Entity public class TestClass implements Serializable{ private Integer id; private Set<String> mySet; @Id @GeneratedValue
Example: public class TestClass { public static void main(String[] args) { TestClass t =
I recently implemented a class like: class TestClass : IDisposable { RegistryKey m_key; public
My jpa looks like below public class TESTClass implements Serializable { ... private String
Given I have a class with two constructors: public class TestClass { ObjectOne o1;

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.