Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 883141
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T12:32:21+00:00 2026-05-15T12:32:21+00:00

Coming from a C background, I’ve always assumed the POD types (eg ints) were

  • 0

Coming from a C background, I’ve always assumed the POD types (eg ints) were never automatically zero-initialized in C++, but it seems this was plain wrong!

My understanding is that only ‘naked’ non-static POD values don’t get zero-filled, as shown in the code snippet. Have I got it right, and are there any other important cases that I’ve missed?

static int a;

struct Foo { int a;};

void test()
{
  int b;     
  Foo f;
  int *c = new(int); 
  std::vector<int> d(1);

  // At this point...
  // a is zero
  // f.a is zero
  // *c is zero
  // d[0] is zero
  // ... BUT ... b is undefined     
}  
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T12:32:22+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 12:32 pm

    Assuming you haven’t modified a before calling test(), a has a value of zero, because objects with static storage duration are zero-initialized when the program starts.

    d[0] has a value of zero, because the constructor invoked by std::vector<int> d(1) has a second parameter that takes a default argument; that second argument is copied into all of the elements of the vector being constructed. The default argument is T(), so your code is equivalent to:

    std::vector<int> d(1, int());
    

    You are correct that b has an indeterminate value.

    f.a and *c both have indeterminate values as well. To value initialize them (which for POD types is the same as zero initialization), you can use:

    Foo f = Foo();      // You could also use Foo f((Foo()))
    int* c = new int(); // Note the parentheses
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Coming from a background, I'm familiar with GUI editors that do a poor job
Coming from a background in Django, I often use template inheritance, where multiple templates
When I was learning Java coming from a background of some 20 years of
Coming from a C# background the naming convention for variables and methods are usually
Coming from a desktop background I'm not sure exactly how to pass the exceptions
Coming from a java background, one of the things I am used to is
Coming from a Perl background, I have to say I prefer cpan Foo::Bar to
Coming from a VB background and being forced to learn C# I have hit
I'm coming from a Rails background and doing some work on a ASP.NET project
I'm coming from a C# background and I really like the type inference that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.