Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7184615
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T18:14:15+00:00 2026-05-28T18:14:15+00:00

Coming from Haskell I was used to have concise operators like not (x `elem`

  • 0

Coming from Haskell I was used to have concise operators like

not ("x" `elem` ["a","b","c"])

What is the most concise way to do that in plain old java, e.g. for an if-clause?

Lists? Arrays? Helper-Function? That feels so ugly and overly verbose …

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T18:14:16+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 6:14 pm

    Check contains method in java collections:

    for example:

    ArrayList<String> arrList = new ArrayList<String>();
    arrList.add("One");
    arrList.add("Two");
    arrList.add("Three");
    
    if( ! arrList.contains("Four"))
    {
        System.out.println("item not contained");
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Coming from Haskell, I'd like to know if there is a way to avoid
Coming to Haskell from a background in various OO languages, one thing that seems
Coming from frameworks like Django and RoR I am used to show and handle
Coming from .NET, I'm used to Ninject, that's a small simple ioc-container. Is there
I am relatively new to Haskell, coming from F# (a Microsoft language). I have
Coming from a Classic ASP background, I'm used to multiple forms on a page,
Coming from a background, I'm familiar with GUI editors that do a poor job
Coming from a desktop background I'm not sure exactly how to pass the exceptions
Coming from a java background, one of the things I am used to is
Coming from C++, I find generic programming indispensable. I wonder how people approach that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.