Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 560771
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T12:22:45+00:00 2026-05-13T12:22:45+00:00

Common scenario: Hierachical domain model is being mapped to flat view model for presentation

  • 0

Common scenario:

Hierachical domain model is being mapped to flat view model for presentation purposes.

I have a full validation setup in my domain and would like to avoid mapping view model to domain object just to find out that some property is invalid. Nor do I want to duplicate my validation logic in my view models.

What are some good practices here?

I’m against interfaces for both view models and domain objects, since view models are usually stringy and flat, whereas domain objects are often nested and have many other data types for properties.

I’m thinking about some pluggable validator that will be smart enough to validate both domain objects and view models but a bit skeptical about implementation.

But for simplicity I’m leaning towards this approach:

Server side validation happens only in domain model; view models are not validated, but data is validated on the client with JavaScript. So in most cases my view models will be valid and validation logic will stay in one place and will occur only in domain model. This approach has a drawback that asp.net mvc 2 validation will not be able to support it.
What do you think?

Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T12:22:45+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:22 pm

    The Microsoft Enterprise Library offers such a ‘Pluggable Validation’ library which is based on generics if memory serves.

    I didn’t like the way that it worked, not to mention the number of dependencies on other EL components but it still might be worth a look.

    I’m by no means an expert in this field but I firmly believe that data should be validated just before you want to do something with it and ALWAYS before commiting to your repository. Therefore, the best place for your Validation Logic is your Business Logic Layer. Client Side validation, although pleasent for the user, makes code maintainance a nightmare and also results in code duplication which can cause problems further down the line.

    Your presentation objects should, in my opinion, be DTO’s. When a user submits data back to your controllers (and BLL) you can use parsers to transform the presentation objects into business objects which can then be validated.

    I reccommend having a read of Rudy Lacovara’s blog (aka The Angry .NET Developer). He’s a very modest bloke with a lot of good stuff to say on things like this.

    HTH

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 357k
  • Answers 357k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The other answers are correct. Here is some code you… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer you ruin the noConflict concept by reassigning the jquery to… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you get that particular error, you don't actually have… May 14, 2026 at 9:40 am

Related Questions

No related questions found

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.