Compiler deal with source code as strings so in C++ for example when it encourage statement like unsigned char x = 150; it knows from type limits that unsigned char must be in range between 0 and 255.
My question is while the number 150 remain string what algorithm compiler use to compare digit sequence – 150 in this case – against type limits?
I made a simple algorithm to do that for type ‘int’ for decimal, octal, hexadecimal and little endian binary but i don’t think compiler do such thing like that to detect overflow in numbers.
the algorithm i made are coded in C++:
typedef signed char int8;
typedef signed int int32;
#define DEC 0
#define HEX 1
#define OCT 2
#define BIN 3
bool isOverflow(const char* value, int32 base)
{
// left-most digit for maximum and minimum number
static const char* max_numbers[4][2] =
{
// INT_MAX INT_MIN
{ "2147483647", "2147483648" }, // decimal
{ "7fffffff", "80000000" }, // hexadecimal
{ "17777777777", "20000000000" }, // octal
{ "01111111111111111111111111111111", "10000000000000000000000000000000" } // binary
};
// size of strings in max_numbers array
static const int32 number_sizes[] = { 10, 8, 11, 32 };
// input string size
int32 str_len = strlen(value);
// is sign mark exist in input string
int32 signExist = ((base == DEC || base == OCT) && *value == '-');
// first non zero digit in input number
int32 non_zero_index = signExist;
// locate first non zero index
while(non_zero_index < str_len && value[non_zero_index] == 0) non_zero_index++;
// if non_zero_index equal length then all digits are zero
if (non_zero_index == str_len) return false;
// get number of digits that actually represent the number
int32 diff = str_len - non_zero_index;
// if difference less than 10 digits then no overflow will happened
if (diff < number_sizes[base]) return false;
// if difference greater than 10 digits then overflow will happened
if (diff > number_sizes[base]) return true;
// left digit in input and search strings
int8 left1 = 0, left2 = 0;
// if digits equal to 10 then loop over digits from left to right and compare
for (int32 i = 0; non_zero_index < str_len; non_zero_index++, i++)
{
// get input digit
left1 = value[non_zero_index];
// get match digit
left2 = max_numbers[signExist][i];
// if digits not equal then if left1 is greater overflow will occurred, false otherwise
if (left1 != left2) return left1 > left2;
}
// overflow won't happened
return false;
}
This algorithm can be optimized to work with all integers types but with float-point i have to make new one to work with IEEE float-point representation.
i think compilers use efficient algorithm to detect overflow other than mine, don’t you?
Compilers handle it pretty much the easiest possible way: they convert the number to an integer or float as appropriate. There’s no law that says the compiler can’t convert from strings to some other representation as appropriate.
But now, consider your original problem; what about if you took the digits and just built routines to treat them as numbers? Say, for example, an algorithm that could take
and compute the sum as a two-digit string
11? Extend that to other operations and you could compute whether32769is greater than32768directly.