Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 582667
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T14:42:41+00:00 2026-05-13T14:42:41+00:00

Compiling the same code on two different machines. We have int functions that are

  • 0

Compiling the same code on two different machines. We have int functions that are not explicitly defined as such in the CPP file.

One machine compiles fine, the other doesn’t. What’s really weird is that they were both working fine until yesterday. One of the machines lost its visual studio include and link paths and now the compile is being much fussier.

What should we be looking for?

Thanks in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T14:42:41+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 2:42 pm

    We found the issue. An add-on product must have had the disable:4430 in its header files. At some point that paths to that was lost and it was loading an older version.

    thanks!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am compiling the same project under two different compilers. The snippet below compiles
For the same code, Eclipse shows warnings about unused variables, but compiling with javac
When compiling a c file that uses old style function definition like int foo(a)
Example: I have two shared objects (same should apply to .dlls). The first shared
I have two WCF services which are logically different and I wish to keep
Say I have a class in Python that has an eq method defined for
Compiling this code with g++ 4.7.0 ( -Wall -Wextra -Werror -Wconversion -std=c++11 ): #include
In compiling qt I found that there is a qws target called arm-linux-gcc. I
When compiling shared libraries in gcc the -fPIC option compiles the code as position
I am comparing different clustering methods and I would like to see if two

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.