Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 159489
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T10:52:06+00:00 2026-05-11T10:52:06+00:00

compiling with gcc C99 I have been using enums for a while now. However,

  • 0

compiling with gcc C99

I have been using enums for a while now. However, I am using some sample code to develop my application. And I came across some code like this. I have been informed this is the best practice use when using enums. But I don’t see how this has any advantages.

typedef enum {     TYPE_DATE,     TYPE_TIME,     TYPE_MONEY,      TYPE_COUNT,     TYPE_UNKNOWN = TYPE_COUNT } string_type_e; 

Why have the TYPE_COUNT and why assign TYPE_COUNT to TYPE_UNKNOWN?

Many thanks for any suggestions,

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T10:52:06+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:52 am

    By default, enums are automatically given integer values starting from 0 by the compiler. So date will be zero, time one and money two. The next value is given to the ‘psuedo’ enum value TYPE_COUNT, which will get given the value three, which happens to be the number of ‘proper’ enum values.

    TYPE_UNKNOWN is another value which represents something which isn’t a ‘proper’ value, so will fail a test e < TYPE_COUNT. Having it equal to TYPE_COUNT means that each distinct meaningful value is contiguous, but I’m not aware of any significant advantage to that (there would be if TYPE_COUNT was one less than a power of 2, which might effect what representation the compiler could use, and its ‘nice’ to have the values contiguous, but it doesn’t really matter, as you wouldn’t increment them past TYPE_COUNT anyway)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 124k
  • Answers 124k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Are you running on OS 3.0? I saw the same… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It looks like you need to register Apache::Session::Memcached with Apache::Session::Wrapper,… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use DATENAME or DATEPART: SELECT DATENAME(dw,GETDATE()) -- Friday SELECT DATEPART(dw,GETDATE())… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am

Related Questions

compiling with gcc C99 I am trying to compare 2 string using string compare.
I was using mysql++ library and compiling with GCC 3.3.4. That GCC version had
On some of our linux boxes compiling with gcc -std=c99 makes struct ip_mreq disappear
I'm having a problem with my compiler telling me there is an 'undefined reference

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.