Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9271923

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T15:44:57+00:00 2026-06-18T15:44:57+00:00

Concerning the ReaderWriterLockSlim : Acquiring two locks subsequently within the same thread should actually

  • 0

Concerning the ReaderWriterLockSlim:

Acquiring two locks subsequently within the same thread should actually throw a LockRecursionException (the recursion policy is set to NoRecursion).

My observation results:

  • reader lock, then reader lock –> LockRecursionException
  • reader lock, then upgradeable reader lock –> LockRecursionException
  • reader lock, then writer lock –> LockRecursionException
  • upgradeable reader lock, then reader lock –> no exception
  • upgradeable reader lock, then upgradeable reader lock –> LockRecursionException
  • upgradeable reader lock, then writer lock –> no exception
  • writer lock, then reader lock –> LockRecursionException
  • writer lock, then upgradeable reader lock –> LockRecursionException
  • writer lock, then writer lock –> LockRecursionException

Is this behavior correct?

  • 0 0 Answers
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T15:44:58+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 3:44 pm

    From the docs:

    A thread in upgradeable mode can downgrade to read mode by first calling the EnterReadLock method and then calling the ExitUpgradeableReadLock method. This downgrade pattern is allowed for all lock recursion policies, even NoRecursion.

    My understanding is that for the writing situation, entering a write lock is the normal way to move from upgradeable to write mode anyway, so has to be supported even under a policy of NoRecursion (there would seem to be little point to a non-upgradeable upgradeable lock 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Concerning the .htaccess documenation, putting a .htaccess file in a directory should affect this
Concerning validation, Are javascript and ASP.NET validation used for the same purpose? If yes,
I have a question concerning Javascript: I want to have the same effect of
I have 3 questions concerning events: Should I always unsubscribe events that were subscribed?
I have a problem concerning delegates in a Windows Forms application. There are two
Look I'm concerning about what is faster/best about consuming a WebService who is within
I have an issue concerning constraints which should be generated dynamically from a list
I have read tutorial concerning background thread(or worker thread) and now I get confused
Concerning headers in a library, I see two options, and I'm not sure if
Two questions concerning using uniq command, please help. First question Say I have two

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.