Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9221229
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T03:31:58+00:00 2026-06-18T03:31:58+00:00

Consider a set of strings like the following: Memory size = 4,194,304 KB Cache

  • 0

Consider a set of strings like the following:

Memory size = 4,194,304 KB
Cache size=   32,768 K
Number of cores = 8
Note   =4,000,000 KB is less than 4 GB

Is there a generic and not too complex Java regular expression that matches each string entirely and produces the following groups?

"Memory size", "4,194,304", "KB"
"Cache size", "32,768", "K"
"Number of cores", "8"
"Note", "4,000,000 KB is less than 4 GB"

These groups are key, value and (optional) suffix.

Additional requirements:

  • The value (i.e., the part after ‘=’) is not necessarily a number
  • Any spaces on either side of ‘:’ should be removed in one pass, without backtracking
  • The “KB” and “K” string matching is not case sensitive
  • The captured groups should always have the same index (ideally, 3 groups for key/value/suffix, with the same group index for all matches)

Clearly, a simple expression like

  • ([^=]+) *: *([^=]+)

does not fully cover the specification above.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T03:31:59+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 3:31 am

    A regex that fully covers the spec above is:

    ^([^=]+?) *= *(.+?) *$
    

    EDIT

    Turns out I missed the K/KB part. Here is the amended version:

    ^([^=]+?) *= *(.+?) *(KB?)? *$
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Please consider the following code: public class Person ( public string FirstName {get; set;}
Consider the following declaration as part of SomeClass private Set<String> blah = new HashSet<String>();
Consider the following: set.seed(1) RandData <- rnorm(100,sd=20) Locations <- rep(c('England','Wales'),each=50) today <- Sys.Date() dseq
Consider following script: SET LANGUAGE 'German' GO SET DATEFIRST 1 GO DECLARE @FullDate DATETIME
consider the following class and struct public class Entity { public IdType Id {get;set;}
Ok this looks like a major fundamental bug in .NET: Consider the following simple
Consider the following model: public class BandProfileModel { public BandModel Band { get; set;
Consider the following interface public interface ICustomData { String CustomData { set; get; }
Consider the following structures: internal struct Coordinate { public Double Top { get; set;
Consider a method in delegate Public void findThisMethod(String a,Set b,HashSet c){} So from action

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.