Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 86731
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T22:17:32+00:00 2026-05-10T22:17:32+00:00

Consider a template class like: template<typename ReturnType, ReturnType Fn()> class Proxy { void run()

  • 0

Consider a template class like:

template<typename ReturnType, ReturnType Fn()> class Proxy {     void run()     {         ReturnType ret = Fn();         // ... do something ...     } };  // and a functions int fn1() { return 5; } float fn2() { return 5; } 

This can be instantiated by using:

Proxy<int, &fn1> p1; 

But explicitly declaring the return value type seems needless. What I am trying to achieve is something like:

 someProxyInstantation<&fn1> p1;  someProxyInstantation<&fn2> p2; 

Unfortunately, I’m no c++ expect and this seems like a hidden corner of the language (at least for me).

If I could just get from the pointer to the function to its type – something like: std::tr1::result_of<&fn>::type // Error 1 error C2923: ‘std::tr1::result_of’ : ‘fn1’ is not a valid template type argument for parameter ‘_Fty’

the error makes sense since the parameter is not a ‘type’ at all

C++0x has the decltype(&fn1) but that is years away.

Any way of doing this in C++03 (+ tr1)?

Restrictions: – I don’t want to pass the functor, f1 and f2 have to remain global functions that have a return value (can’t move it to parameter).)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T22:17:32+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 10:17 pm

    This isn’t possible in C++03. If you want to pass a function pointer as a non-type parameter, the compiler has to know the type of the parameter. So you have to provide the missing pieces (in this case, the return type). You can give the proxy the function pointer as a value at runtime, and provide it with the type of it as the only argument. Then you could write a generator function for you that does this job:

    template<typename T> Proxy<T> make_proxy(T t) { return Proxy<T>(t); } 

    Sadly, in current C++, you still have to give it the type in order to assign to a automatic variable:

    Proxy<int(*)()> p = make_proxy(&fn1); 

    You can’t use auto p = make_proxy(&fn1); yet. Note that if you want to use a function type on the left side, you have to change the generator function to provide not a function pointer type:

    template<typename T> Proxy<typename boost::remove_pointer<T>::type> make_proxy(T t) {      return Proxy<typename boost::remove_pointer<T>::type>(t);  } 

    Now you can do

    Proxy<int()> p = make_proxy(&fn1); 

    using the proxy, you can now just do

    doSomething(make_proxy(&fn1)); 

    And if doSomething is templated or otherwise polymorphic, it will not require you to know the exact type of the function.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider the following use of template template parameters... #include <iostream> template <typename X> class
Consider the following code: #include <stdio.h> namespace Foo { template <typename T> void foo(T
Consider the following code: template <int dim> struct vec { vec normalize(); }; template
Consider these two function definitions: void foo() { } void foo(void) { } Is
Consider the Oracle emp table. I'd like to get the employees with the top
Consider the following setup: A windows PC with a LAN interface and a WiFi
Consider the need to develop a lightweight desktop DB application on the Microsoft platforms.
Consider: List<String> someList = new ArrayList<>(); // add "monkey", "donkey", "skeleton key" to someList
Consider this problem: I have a program which should fetch (let's say) 100 records

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.