Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 672355
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T00:28:33+00:00 2026-05-14T00:28:33+00:00

Consider an object declared in a method: public void foo() { final Object obj

  • 0

Consider an object declared in a method:

public void foo() {
    final Object obj = new Object();

    // A long run job that consumes tons of memory and 
    // triggers garbage collection
}

Will obj be subject to garbage collection before foo() returns?

UPDATE:
Previously I thought obj is not subject to garbage collection until foo() returns.

However, today I find myself wrong.

I have spend several hours in fixing a bug and finally found the problem is caused by obj garbage collected!

Can anyone explain why this happens? And if I want obj to be pinned how to achieve it?

Here is the code that has problem.

public class Program
{
    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        String connectionString = "jdbc:mysql://<whatever>";

        // I find wrap is gc-ed somewhere
        SqlConnection wrap = new SqlConnection(connectionString); 

        Connection con = wrap.currentConnection();
        Statement stmt = con.createStatement(ResultSet.TYPE_FORWARD_ONLY, 
             ResultSet.CONCUR_READ_ONLY);
        stmt.setFetchSize(Integer.MIN_VALUE);

        ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery("select instance_id, doc_id from
               crawler_archive.documents");

        while (rs.next()) {
            int instanceID = rs.getInt(1);
            int docID = rs.getInt(2);

            if (docID % 1000 == 0) {
                System.out.println(docID);
            }
        }

        rs.close();
        //wrap.close();
    }
}

After running the Java program, it will print the following message before it crashes:

161000
161000
********************************
Finalizer CALLED!!
********************************
********************************
Close CALLED!!
********************************
162000
Exception in thread "main" com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.CommunicationsException: 

And here is the code of class SqlConnection:

class SqlConnection
{
    private final String connectionString;
    private Connection connection;

    public SqlConnection(String connectionString) {
        this.connectionString = connectionString;
    }

    public synchronized Connection currentConnection() throws SQLException {
        if (this.connection == null || this.connection.isClosed()) {
            this.closeConnection();
            this.connection = DriverManager.getConnection(connectionString);
        }
        return this.connection;
    }

    protected void finalize() throws Throwable {
        try {
            System.out.println("********************************");
            System.out.println("Finalizer CALLED!!");
            System.out.println("********************************");
            this.close();
        } finally {
            super.finalize();
        }
    }

    public void close() {
        System.out.println("********************************");
        System.out.println("Close CALLED!!");
        System.out.println("********************************");
        this.closeConnection();
    }

    protected void closeConnection() {
        if (this.connection != null) {
            try {
                connection.close();
            } catch (Throwable e) {
            } finally {
                this.connection = null;
            }
        }
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T00:28:34+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 12:28 am

    As your code is written the object pointed to by “wrap” shouldn’t be eligible for garbage collection until “wrap” pops off the stack at the end of the method.

    The fact that it is being collected suggests to me your code as compiled doesn’t match the original source and that the compiler has done some optimisation such as changing this:

    SqlConnection wrap = new SqlConnection(connectionString); 
    Connection con = wrap.currentConnection();
    

    to this:

    Connection con = new SqlConnection(connectionString).currentConnection();
    

    (Or even inlining the whole thing) because “wrap” isn’t used beyond this point. The anonymous object created would be eligible for GC immediately.

    The only way to be sure is to decompile the code and see what’s been done to it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider Object obj = ....; System.out.println(obj instanceof Object); What should obj be so that
Consider: var object = { foo: {}, bar: {}, baz: {} } How would
Consider the following Mechanize form object #<Mechanize::Form {name f1} {method POST} {action f.php} {fields
Consider the following arbitrary line of code: $object = new My_Object(); In Netbeans you
Consider this scenario. I have an object, lets call it.... Foo. Foo raises a
Consider the method declaration: String.format(String, Object ...) The Object ... argument is just a
Consider the following snippet: import java.util.*; public class EqualsOverload { public static void main(String[]
Consider this abstract class public abstract class Foo { public Injectable Prop {get;set;} }
Consider the following example code: class Foo { }; class Bar : public Foo
Consider: class base { base(); virtual void func(); } class derived : public base

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.