Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9116297
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T04:38:19+00:00 2026-06-17T04:38:19+00:00

Consider class A and B. Class A is befriended by class B. Class B

  • 0

Consider class A and B. Class A is befriended by class B. Class B has a private constructor. Can class A create class B instances, or is a private constructor an indication to the compiler that the class cannot be instantiated, even by a friend class?
Here’s some sample code:

class B;

class A {
    void myFunction() {
        B newBobject;
    }
};

class B {
    private:
        B() {}
    public:
        int someData;
        friend class A;
};

Also, note I’m using C++03. If it’s not valid in C++03, is it allowed in C++11?

As a side question, how is the Singleton method related? Does it deal specifically with instantiating one and only one instance of an object, or is it something else?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T04:38:20+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 4:38 am

    Your code(more like your idea) is actually error free and valid on both C++03 and c++11.

    There are 2 errors in your code however. To create an object of type B, you need to see the entire definition of B, and that means the definitions of B and A need to be exchanged.

    Secondly, you need to make myfunction public, or call it from within class A.

    To answer your other question.. Most singletons are implemented somewhat like this..

    class Singleton{
    private:
    
       Singleton(){}
    public:
       static Singleton& GetInstance(){
           static Singleton instance;
           return instance;
       }
    };
    

    This would prevent anybody but the Singleton class (and a friend as you have discovered) from making an instance of the class, so it is easier to enforce the 1 object rule. The Singleton will be accessed as Singleton::GetInstance().

    This and other possible implementations are shown at Wikipedia.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider a class that has some events. This event list is going to grow.
Consider: public class HomeController : Controller { private IDependency dependency; public HomeController(IDependency dependency) {
It may not be so obvious how respond_to? works in ruby. Consider that: class
Consider this sample class, class TargetClass { private static String SENSITIVE_DATA = sw0rdfish; private
consider this class,with no instance variables and only methods which are non-synchronous can we
Consider a class like so: template < class T > class MyClass { private:
Could you clarify some ideas behind Python classes and class instances? Consider this: class
Consider a class that's used to represent the results of a GroupBy() . The
Consider a class Calendar that stores a bunch of Date objects. The calendar is
Consider a class OriginalClass that might or might not be available on runtime. OriginalClass

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.