Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9219423
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T03:06:50+00:00 2026-06-18T03:06:50+00:00

Consider the following C++ Program #include<map> #include<iostream> int main() { int a = 5,

  • 0

Consider the following C++ Program

#include<map>
#include<iostream>
int main() {
    int a = 5, b = 7;
    auto pair = std::make_pair<int, int>(a,b);
    return 0;
    }

Using VC11 and also in gcc-4.7.2 fails with different errors, though it seems to be related and VC11 error message is more meaningful

You cannot bind an lvalue to an rvalue   

What I understand from this failure is

  1. VC11 and I suppose gcc-4.7.2 have only one implementation of std::make_pair make_pair(_Ty1&& _Val1, const _Ty2& _Val2) which can accept only an rvalue reference. Prior VC++ version example VC10 had two versions, one to accept an lvalue and another an rvalue reference
  2. Rvalue reference cannot be used to initialize a non const reference i.e. int & a = b * 5 is invalid.
  3. I could have used std::move to convert the lvalue to rvalue reference and the call would be successful.
  4. As std::make_pair accepts two different types for each of the parameters, Template Argument Resolution in all possible cases can resolve the type of the parameter and an explicitly specifying the type is not required.

This scenario seems trivial and the incompatibility can easily be resolved by removing the explicit type specification and making the definition as

auto pair = std::make_pair(a,b);
  • Now, my question is, what is the driving factor to remove the lvalue implementation from the library?
  • Is it possible to know any other library functions which has been changed in similar ways?
  • How to handle these situations when I need to target multiple compilers like g++, CC, aCC, XL C++ where either the compilers have not been upgraded or the compiler isn’t supporting the rvalue reference and or move semantics.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T03:06:51+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 3:06 am

    std::make_pair exists for the sole purpose of exploiting type deduction to avoid typing the names of the types. That’s why there is only one overload (and it should take two universal references, not one universal reference and an lvalue reference to const as VC seems to think).

    template <class T1, class T2>
    constexpr pair<V1, V2> make_pair(T1&& x, T2&& y);
    

    If you want to type the types explicitly, you can just use the pair constructor. It is even shorter…

    auto pair = std::pair<int, int>(a,b);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider the following program. #include<iostream> using namespace std; class base { public: int _bval;
Consider the following program: #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { return 0; } When i
Consider the following short program: #include <type_traits> #include <iostream> using namespace std; template <typename
Consider the following program #include <iostream> #include<cstdlib> using namespace std; class E { public:
Consider the following small program: #include <cstdio> int main() { printf(%d\n, 1); std::printf(%d\n, 2);
Consider the following program: #include <iostream> #include <algorithm> using namespace std; template<class T> struct
Consider the following program: #include <iostream> #include boost/filesystem.hpp int main() { boost::filesystem::directory_entry d(test.txt); boost::filesystem::directory_entry
Consider the following program: #include <array> int main() { std::array<int, 1> x = {
Lets us consider the following program : #include <stdlib.h> int main(int argc, char **argv){
Consider the following program. #include <stdio.h> int main() { int a[10]={0}; printf(%p %p\n, a,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.