Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8901195
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T01:17:14+00:00 2026-06-15T01:17:14+00:00

Consider the following code below, I’ve been thought by Lynda.com to create a database

  • 0

Consider the following code below, I’ve been thought by Lynda.com
to create a database class like this, my question is why not create
a static method for the database entirely instead of storing an
instance into a static property?

<?php
class Database {

  private $conn;
  private static $init;

  public function __construct() {
     $this->conn = new mysqli('localhost','root','root','mydb');
  }

  public static function getInstance() {
     self::$init = new self();
     return self::$init;
  }

}

$db = Database::getInstance();

?>
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T01:17:15+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 1:17 am

    If you want to use singleton you should to protect __construct()

    class DB
    {
      private static $instance;
    
      private function __construct($args)
      {
        // do some
      }
    
      public static function getInstance()
      {
        // get instance
      }
    }
    
    $query = 'SELECT etc...';
    $stmt = DB::getInstance()->prepare($query);
    

    I use this pattern in DB class. But if you have more than 1 connection you should NOT! use singleton.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider the following code snippet below. class X { public String toString() { return
Consider the following sample code below: #include <iostream> using namespace std; class base {
Consider the following code: template <class x1, class x2 = int*> struct CoreTemplate {
Consider the following code: $(document).ready(function() { $(body).append(<div class='outer'><span class='inner'>Click me</span></div>); $(html).click(function(event) { var targetClass
Consider the following code in a DLL: public class ReceivingClass { private Assembly myAssembly;
Consider the following code: public abstract class RepositoryBase<T> where T : class { #region
Consider the following code: #include <iostream> struct test { void public_test() { [this]() {
Consider the following example code: class Foo { }; class Bar : public Foo
Consider the code below, taken from here . For this code, I get the
Consider the following code: abstract class Foo<T> where T : Foo<T>, new() { void

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.