Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6640033
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T23:37:32+00:00 2026-05-25T23:37:32+00:00

Consider the following code, compiled with g++ problem.cpp -o problem : #include <vector> using

  • 0

Consider the following code, compiled with g++ problem.cpp -o problem:

#include <vector>

using namespace std;

int main()
{
    while(1){}
    return 0;
}

When this code is executed, the command top reports that ~80K of memory is being consumed.

Now consider this code:

#include <vector>

using namespace std;

int main()
{
    vector<int> testVec;
    for(int i = 0;i<100000000;i++)testVec.push_back(i);
    while(1){}
    return 0;
}

As expected, top report that around ~300MB of memory is consumed.

Now finally, consider this code:

#include <vector>

using namespace std;

int main()
{
    vector<int> testVec;
    for(int i = 0;i<100000000;i++)testVec.push_back(i);
    testVec.clear();
    vector<int>().swap(testVec);
    while(1){}
    return 0;
}

Now top reports that ~4196K is being consumed(!) — why isn’t it only ~80K is as in the first example? How can I finally free up that last bit of memory that is presumably being consumed by the vector? I’ve read that in addition to .clear(), the ‘swap trick’ is meant to free up everything but apparently it’s not working as I expected it would do. What am I missing?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T23:37:32+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 11:37 pm

    You should probably just ignore it. The swap trick frees the memory from the vector, but that does not mean that the allocator (or even the malloc or equivalent implementation underneath) will yield the memory back to the system. That is, the vector is most probably not the one holding the memory up.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Please let us consider following code: #include <iostream> using namespace std; union{ int i;
Consider the following code which shows compile time error : #include <stdio.h> int main(int
Consider the following program: #include <iostream> #include <iterator> #include <vector> #include <utility> using namespace
Consider the following code: int main() { int *p; ++((int){5}); //compile without err/warning &((int){5});
Consider the following code: void Increment(int *arr) { arr++; } int main() { int
Consider the following code template<unsigned int N> void foo(std::bitset<N> bs) { /* whatever */
Please consider the following code: vector<int> myVector; myVector.push_back(10); myVector.erase(myVector.end()); This code compiles and runs
Consider the following code. #include <iostream> #include <string> struct SimpleStruct { operator std::string ()
I encountered this problem while solving a practice test Consider the following code written
Consider the following code: abstract class SomeClassX<T> { // blah } class SomeClassY: SomeClassX<int>

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.